Who trashes my popular articles?
44 Star it
Share
Dr.Ratan Saini , Agra:
Aug 1 2008
Made Popular Aug 1 2008
It is very strange to note that some people are here who do not want to read the truth and all out to trash good words of Great Saints.

I would like to ask them why you trash?
Write your views if you do not agree and give reasons for that ?
Looking forward to a positive attitude from all members.
And also a clear cut answer from administration, if this kind of trashing will continue for ever at Indtsblogs?
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
8 Stars
Subhabrata
sdas.bravehost.com/
Aug 1 2008
New Delhi,
India
I too agree with Dr. Saini. Members should share their views and comments instead of simply dump the article
Comment Link
4 Stars
Such a golden words written by Dr. Ratan are trashed by some one shows the mindset of people arround here.
How this community can grow and devlop as a leadeing blog space if we have such closed minded people?
How this community can grow and devlop as a leadeing blog space if we have such closed minded people?
7 Stars
The value of your articles is not in the criticsm of others but in the content of your subject. Kindly don’t get disheartened. You are a good writer. We appreciate your articles.
4 Stars
Even I have faced this...
It is unfair to trash articles in a forum like Instablogs where all are free to comment and choose what to read and what not to read.
It is unfair to trash articles in a forum like Instablogs where all are free to comment and choose what to read and what not to read.
5 Stars
That is enormous work .you are looking into some excellent thoughts which will do world of good for instablogs.I totally agree with your point ,when we are allowed to present our views then why TRASH ?
4 Stars
This is not a good sign for a good community which wants to grow and do some thing for the society.
I deeply condemn such an act and would request the administrators of the blog to remove such an option of trashing any article. Only the editors should have any such right that two they can propose to the chief editor and on approval of the same any article may be trashed.
What other members can do is, they should support this kind of procedure or arrangement to trash any article, as mentioned above.
I deeply condemn such an act and would request the administrators of the blog to remove such an option of trashing any article. Only the editors should have any such right that two they can propose to the chief editor and on approval of the same any article may be trashed.
What other members can do is, they should support this kind of procedure or arrangement to trash any article, as mentioned above.
4 Stars
I also agree to such an administrative option for trashing any article popular or upcoming.
Only the Chief Editor should have a right to trash any article, prosed by members, star members or regional or super editors.
The concerned persons in management should look into this and implement the same at the earliest for the true growth of the Instablogs.
Only the Chief Editor should have a right to trash any article, prosed by members, star members or regional or super editors.
The concerned persons in management should look into this and implement the same at the earliest for the true growth of the Instablogs.
4 Stars
Looking forward to such an arrangement from Instablogs.
8 Stars
Hello Dr Ratan, although I completely agree with what you have said that Instablogs should be the platform for healthy debate, and people should have the freedom of choice to read or not to read an article, I want to humbly point out that if Instablogs becomes just a platform for articles with religious overtones and spiritual bent, it would loose its essence. Your articles are very thought provoking, deeply spiritual, and there can be thousands of people around the globe who swear by them. But they should not take the stance of preaching and enlightening the whole world. Then the conflict starts, and people have a tendency to dump them in the trash can. Infact, you personally had asked me to give my comments on some of your articles, but I preferred to keep quiet, as I do not agree with some of your views. As Madhuri has aptly said, its the freedom of choice!
4 Stars
If one is not agreeing with any article he can simply write his views and the reasons.
But to trash any article which is like by many is shear indiscipline on part of the person who is doing it and the management of the blog administrators.
If you write some good article and they are trashed by some one how you feel about it?
But to trash any article which is like by many is shear indiscipline on part of the person who is doing it and the management of the blog administrators.
If you write some good article and they are trashed by some one how you feel about it?
9 Stars
I also remember trashing one of your articles yesterday. It was a poem on Saint Kabir.
The poem was good but has nothing to do with news.
I think we need groups on Instablogs, where people share stuff other than news.
Poems can`t be mixed with news and op-ed pieces.
The poem was good but has nothing to do with news.
I think we need groups on Instablogs, where people share stuff other than news.
Poems can`t be mixed with news and op-ed pieces.
6 Stars
An Article is not required to be news, if I understand instablogs policy.
4 Stars
This is too bad on part of fello members to delet popular artilces like this and admin should look into the problem so that such thing do not repeat any time in future.
5 Stars
I dont get it. Why would someone do this? I mean can you stop people from thinking something? And if we cant then whats the point of stopping them from expressing?
I dont know what instablogs policy is but if this is how people are gonna react, i will be trashed out of this community soon... lol
I dont know what instablogs policy is but if this is how people are gonna react, i will be trashed out of this community soon... lol
5 Stars
Very true, there will be no good writers and readers on this blog space if this contnues like this.
5 Stars
I am waiting for a response from Instablogs about a concrete reply and will surely follow your suggestion.
4 Stars
I think such a community can not progress who wants to close the eyes and want take away the pen from noble writers.
Alas !!! Where we are heading to ?
.......
A coward society which do not want to read the truth.
Alas !!! Where we are heading to ?
.......
A coward society which do not want to read the truth.
6 Stars
True!!!
I was told we cud express here whatever we wanted. But if this forum is meant for the news of ”politics” alone, then adieu from my side, as to me politics is the shallowest thing on earth!
Dr. Ratan is sharing beautiful things; its ugly to trash them. You dont agree, fine, but trashing implies trashing someone’s heart... heart is where God dwells...
”Bay shak Mandir, Masjid touro Bulle Shah ye Kehta
Pyar bhara dil na touro, is mein Eshwer rehta!”
Dr. Ratan, you have a heart full of love and know that I love u and am with you!!!
I was told we cud express here whatever we wanted. But if this forum is meant for the news of ”politics” alone, then adieu from my side, as to me politics is the shallowest thing on earth!
Dr. Ratan is sharing beautiful things; its ugly to trash them. You dont agree, fine, but trashing implies trashing someone’s heart... heart is where God dwells...
”Bay shak Mandir, Masjid touro Bulle Shah ye Kehta
Pyar bhara dil na touro, is mein Eshwer rehta!”
Dr. Ratan, you have a heart full of love and know that I love u and am with you!!!
8 Stars
I think everything is working perfect here at Instablogs. I read all articles of Dr. Saini, all are excellent pieces. However, what’s the point in just rewriting the “good words of Great Saints” here. If it’s related to the context of any story, it’s fine, but otherwise I don’t see any point in reposting all religious Almanacs of the world here. Be original!
5 Stars
Question is if Insatblog has no such prohibition on such postings then who has the right to tarsh the article liked by so mant including you?
6 Stars
Trashing someone’s articles is nothing but an act of cowardice. This act simply reflects the doer’s weak state of mind! It’s like damaging a painter’s painting, just because you yourself can’t paint!
Instablogs should simply ask the person trashing somone’s article to give an appropriate reason for doing so! and only if they are able to give any reasonable reason for doing so, should the article be trashed!
Instablogs should simply ask the person trashing somone’s article to give an appropriate reason for doing so! and only if they are able to give any reasonable reason for doing so, should the article be trashed!
5 Stars
Thats right !!
When Instablogs has open policy and allow any article to be posted and liked by members than what is the justification that which gives right of deleting an article.
If it is desired to control the quality of articles then let it be referred first to the editor and then on its approval it may be published. But once any one can freely anything then how one can delete the same without any valid rule or reason?
I request Instablog administration to please clarify this point and let everyone know the change, if any, in this policy of trashing?
When Instablogs has open policy and allow any article to be posted and liked by members than what is the justification that which gives right of deleting an article.
If it is desired to control the quality of articles then let it be referred first to the editor and then on its approval it may be published. But once any one can freely anything then how one can delete the same without any valid rule or reason?
I request Instablog administration to please clarify this point and let everyone know the change, if any, in this policy of trashing?
8 Stars
Naheeeeeeeee ye naheeee ho saktaaaaaaa
Azadi mere dulhan hai... oh sorry... azadi mera dulha hai...lol
Azadi mere dulhan hai... oh sorry... azadi mera dulha hai...lol
4 Stars
I agree to the comment of Dr. Ratan Saini above that a clear cut policy on trashing should be published by Insatblogs.
5 Stars
Yes, there should be no trashing on any article which is allowed to be submitted.
7 Stars
I think there should be a special section for articles out of news or poem or personal stories where users can simply send their views. Let them be published completely unedited, let them to raise their voice but no option for TRASH.
However, DELETE option is also necessary but in the rarest case, and that should be in the hands of chief editor.
Users can simply inform the editorial desk, if s/he finds anything objectionable.
So NO TRASH PLZ...
However, DELETE option is also necessary but in the rarest case, and that should be in the hands of chief editor.
Users can simply inform the editorial desk, if s/he finds anything objectionable.
So NO TRASH PLZ...
3 Stars
The Instablogs has agreed to do the needful and have informed to me that there will be strict control on the article trashing possibility.
4 Stars
I am against Chief Editor.
People should decide what is good or what is bad.
I don`t want Instablogs to be a voice of a single guy (read Chief Editor).
Infact Instablogs doesn’t have a voice of its own. We let people be our voice.
People should decide what is good or what is bad.
I don`t want Instablogs to be a voice of a single guy (read Chief Editor).
Infact Instablogs doesn’t have a voice of its own. We let people be our voice.
7 Stars
WOW.
although I am new to blogging and to INSTABLOGS, I must live in a cave. I didn’t even know it was possible to trash an article, and knowing it is now, I can’t fathom the idea. I will not lie and say I am an avid reader of Dr. Ratan’s work, but after seeing his post, I had to investigate the commotion. Whether the few readers responsible for the destruction of his work would like to admit it or even feel the same way, Dr. Ratan’s work is obviously, due to his stars and comments ON EVERY ARTICLE, doing something right in MANY readers eyes. It seems rather ”almighty”, in my humble eyes to take that gift from someone else simply because one chose to think it was ”inappropiatly” categorized. Do the same people rip out pages of novels, encyclopedias, and other texts they have no intrest for? Are they the ones that rip out pages of magazines left for ALL patients to read in the doctor’s office? I had no idea as a general rule for blogs and otherwise we were FORCED to read each and every article..(I’ve got my work cut out for me). Haven’t they ever heard of Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder or how about this one: ONE MANS TRASH IS ANOTHER MANS TREASURE?
although I am new to blogging and to INSTABLOGS, I must live in a cave. I didn’t even know it was possible to trash an article, and knowing it is now, I can’t fathom the idea. I will not lie and say I am an avid reader of Dr. Ratan’s work, but after seeing his post, I had to investigate the commotion. Whether the few readers responsible for the destruction of his work would like to admit it or even feel the same way, Dr. Ratan’s work is obviously, due to his stars and comments ON EVERY ARTICLE, doing something right in MANY readers eyes. It seems rather ”almighty”, in my humble eyes to take that gift from someone else simply because one chose to think it was ”inappropiatly” categorized. Do the same people rip out pages of novels, encyclopedias, and other texts they have no intrest for? Are they the ones that rip out pages of magazines left for ALL patients to read in the doctor’s office? I had no idea as a general rule for blogs and otherwise we were FORCED to read each and every article..(I’ve got my work cut out for me). Haven’t they ever heard of Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder or how about this one: ONE MANS TRASH IS ANOTHER MANS TREASURE?
3 Stars
This is called negative and destructive approach to life and people with this approach will never be able to enjoy the fruits of true happiness.
4 Stars
I always wondered what the trash button meant. I assumed, though have never used, that it was just to remove it from an individuals home page.
and as Oscar says, if you aren’t interested just don’t read.
and as Oscar says, if you aren’t interested just don’t read.
4 Stars
That is the right way. I my self don’t read so many articles which talk about funny things which has no relevance for me.
5 Stars
What about all good words about freedom of expression. Dr. Saini’s articles are posted in the lifestyle channel and I believe that poems written by great people affects our lives. There is more in our lifestyle than only latest fashion trends.
4 Stars
I find there are people like you here who knows the right answer to the problem and understand the views of a writer.
13 Stars
Dr. Saini,
You are very good in playing to the gallery, aren't you? You have all the freedom to publish your stories without being trashed. I gather that stories are buried when a certain number of users 'trash' it. It is not possible for only one member to trash a story and bury it as it seems to have happened with some of your posts.
It is the community that makes your post reach the popular section of the homepage and it is the community that removes it from there. The power is with the community and not with the individual. So you might find some of your stories being made popular only to find their way in the trash can the next moment.
The irony is that only popular stories become conspicuous (by reaching the popular section of the homepage), and only conspicuous stories are trashed!
So what you feel about your stories are not exactly what the reality is. Contrary to being popular, your stories actually proved to be unpopular and hence, trashed.
Hope you will feel a lot better now.
You are very good in playing to the gallery, aren't you? You have all the freedom to publish your stories without being trashed. I gather that stories are buried when a certain number of users 'trash' it. It is not possible for only one member to trash a story and bury it as it seems to have happened with some of your posts.
It is the community that makes your post reach the popular section of the homepage and it is the community that removes it from there. The power is with the community and not with the individual. So you might find some of your stories being made popular only to find their way in the trash can the next moment.
The irony is that only popular stories become conspicuous (by reaching the popular section of the homepage), and only conspicuous stories are trashed!
So what you feel about your stories are not exactly what the reality is. Contrary to being popular, your stories actually proved to be unpopular and hence, trashed.
Hope you will feel a lot better now.
4 Stars
If story is not popular it remain in upcoming for a given span of time say seven days and after that it is removed automatically.
10 Stars
Hello Dr. Saini,
If you pay attention, you will see three more buttons besides the ’Trash’ button. Now, I would like to say just one thing - if you are prepared to celebrate the first three buttons, then you should also be strong enough to accept the importance of the fourth button ie. the ’Trash’ button.
Its got to do with freedom of choice and any intelligent person like you should know that ’your treasure is not always treasure for others’..and whats not treasure is TRASH.
Personally I feel you should try to nail a good publishing house and make a paperback of your poems, both original and lifted. And yeah, be well aware about the copyright issue.
BTW, I’m going to exercise my right to hit one of the four buttons at the top right corner of this post. Any guesses Dr. Saini, about the button I’m gonna hit?
If you pay attention, you will see three more buttons besides the ’Trash’ button. Now, I would like to say just one thing - if you are prepared to celebrate the first three buttons, then you should also be strong enough to accept the importance of the fourth button ie. the ’Trash’ button.
Its got to do with freedom of choice and any intelligent person like you should know that ’your treasure is not always treasure for others’..and whats not treasure is TRASH.
Personally I feel you should try to nail a good publishing house and make a paperback of your poems, both original and lifted. And yeah, be well aware about the copyright issue.
BTW, I’m going to exercise my right to hit one of the four buttons at the top right corner of this post. Any guesses Dr. Saini, about the button I’m gonna hit?
4 Stars
I have given very clear logic about why trash should not be allowed. Face the world instead of closing your eyes.
7 Stars
Trash feature is important and it should remain there. What if someone posted illegal, rumor, hatred, pornographic material?
This feature helps users to keep Instablogs safe, clean and up to date.
Trash votes helps users in moderating the homepage. Again I repeating it takes more than one trash votes to remove article from the homepage.
If your article is trashed, it means multiple people have voted against you.
This feature helps users to keep Instablogs safe, clean and up to date.
Trash votes helps users in moderating the homepage. Again I repeating it takes more than one trash votes to remove article from the homepage.
If your article is trashed, it means multiple people have voted against you.
6 Stars
Completely agree with you and Nandini. Infact I can’t fathom why an emancipated soul like Dr Ratan will be influenced and hurt by such petty things as to who has trashed his articles? I thought he’s way above all these petty things...LOL:p!!!
6 Stars
Wah Bhai!
Ratan, you are essentially trying to say that "if you like my story comment and star it and if you don't like my story just say why you didn't like/ignore/go away".
Why sir?
If you love the bouquets so much you must also learn to receive brickbats. How many of your stories are being trashed as opposed not to have been trashed? I think only about 2-3?
Ratan, you are essentially trying to say that "if you like my story comment and star it and if you don't like my story just say why you didn't like/ignore/go away".
Why sir?
If you love the bouquets so much you must also learn to receive brickbats. How many of your stories are being trashed as opposed not to have been trashed? I think only about 2-3?
4 Stars
One should write their views opposing what is written in a proper way. If the article is not there what and where are the brickbats going to strike?
6 Stars
If an article is trashed, it is not deleted. It is only removed from the homepage. It remains in your MyBlog.
And it takes more than one vote to get your article trashed. Just like it takes more than one vote to get any article popular.
And it takes more than one vote to get your article trashed. Just like it takes more than one vote to get any article popular.
5 Stars
The TRASH feature is meant to serve a good purpose. But it is also used for other purposes, like “doing away” with an article the “trasher” doesn’t like or “suppressing” the views of a writer whom one doesn’t like, etc.
It should be made mandatory for the “trasher” to give two reasons for his/her action and these reasons should be made public along with the identity of the “trasher” on the article page. This may bring down instances of unnecessary “trashing”.
One of my articles also was “trashed’ by some one. But when I contacted the Instablogs Team, they found the article good, “untrashed” it and moved it to the Home page. You can read it here: Will the Communists support the Congress-led government if Manmohan Singh is replaced?
It is clear that some well laid rules are needed in this connection.
Instablogs may make a separate section available for philosophical deliberations, poems, religious discourses, etc. as Deepak has suggested. And as he has said, the “TRASH” option should be in the hands of the chief editor, who may act on receiving a certain number of “TRASH requests” from Community members.
It should be made mandatory for the “trasher” to give two reasons for his/her action and these reasons should be made public along with the identity of the “trasher” on the article page. This may bring down instances of unnecessary “trashing”.
One of my articles also was “trashed’ by some one. But when I contacted the Instablogs Team, they found the article good, “untrashed” it and moved it to the Home page. You can read it here: Will the Communists support the Congress-led government if Manmohan Singh is replaced?
It is clear that some well laid rules are needed in this connection.
Instablogs may make a separate section available for philosophical deliberations, poems, religious discourses, etc. as Deepak has suggested. And as he has said, the “TRASH” option should be in the hands of the chief editor, who may act on receiving a certain number of “TRASH requests” from Community members.
4 Stars
Your views provide clear indication of what should be the system.
7 Stars
Instablogs doesn`t have Chief Editor. Please leave editorial tyranny for traditional media only.
Here’s all members are equal. They can be writers, editors or moderators.
”TRASH” option is in and will remain in hand of members.
Here’s all members are equal. They can be writers, editors or moderators.
”TRASH” option is in and will remain in hand of members.
4 Stars
It may be seen here as how people behave in so different ways. Forgetting the true sense of right and wrong.
8 Stars
An article can be trashed by any registered member. Once it receives enough ”trash votes” it moves away from the homepage.
This is same way how an article get popular and moves to homepage.
There is no Editorial control over it. But if you are a popular writer like Dr. Saini, who is a Super Editor, then his articles needs more than few trashes to get removed.
Democracy has negative shades as well.
*But look on the other hand 44 comments, you have got a great community build around your opinions.
This is same way how an article get popular and moves to homepage.
There is no Editorial control over it. But if you are a popular writer like Dr. Saini, who is a Super Editor, then his articles needs more than few trashes to get removed.
Democracy has negative shades as well.
*But look on the other hand 44 comments, you have got a great community build around your opinions.
5 Stars
Dear Nandini,
My article which was “trashed” (pl. see my Comment above) was trashed within less than 10 minutes of posting it on Instablogs, and when the article was still in the Upcoming section.
It was easy to understand it had been “trashed” by a person who had been infuriated by my Comments (and those of some other well informed members) in the ongoing discussion on an article at that time (the number of Comments had crossed a hundred). The inability to take part in a discussion with an unbiased and objective mindset led the person to “trash” my news based article that was in no way unfit for publication.
I don’t think 14 members had read that article within 10 minutes and all the 14 found it unfit or objectionable. I think, it is possible for any one member to “trash” an article, clicking the mouse sufficient number of times.
Democracy doesn’t permit one person to hurt another, or empower one person to prevent another from expressing his/her views. The suggestions made here, by a number of members, to introduce some regulations about the use of the TRASH feature are valid and they deserve consideration. ”Regulations” are the very foundation of ”civilization” and they need not be seen as a form of ”tyranny”.
:)
My article which was “trashed” (pl. see my Comment above) was trashed within less than 10 minutes of posting it on Instablogs, and when the article was still in the Upcoming section.
It was easy to understand it had been “trashed” by a person who had been infuriated by my Comments (and those of some other well informed members) in the ongoing discussion on an article at that time (the number of Comments had crossed a hundred). The inability to take part in a discussion with an unbiased and objective mindset led the person to “trash” my news based article that was in no way unfit for publication.
I don’t think 14 members had read that article within 10 minutes and all the 14 found it unfit or objectionable. I think, it is possible for any one member to “trash” an article, clicking the mouse sufficient number of times.
Democracy doesn’t permit one person to hurt another, or empower one person to prevent another from expressing his/her views. The suggestions made here, by a number of members, to introduce some regulations about the use of the TRASH feature are valid and they deserve consideration. ”Regulations” are the very foundation of ”civilization” and they need not be seen as a form of ”tyranny”.
:)
4 Stars
@ Paulraj
I am happy to read your explanation of the reality one experiences. But there are people in this world who can not read the truth and want to delete it.
Thanks for taking time off to write on my article.
I am happy to read your explanation of the reality one experiences. But there are people in this world who can not read the truth and want to delete it.
Thanks for taking time off to write on my article.
5 Stars
Thank you Dr. Ratan!
What needs to be said, must be said.
What needs to be said, must be said.
3 Stars
@ R.M.Paulraj
One member can trash a story only once, just like one member is allowed only one vote/star per story.
Democracy has some benefits and some pitfalls as well.
Just tell me a better solution than to let our readers moderate the stories. We don`t want team of editors to police stories submitted. Not all stories deserve to be on homepage.
So there are two options, hire a team of editors to star or trash stories or let users do it.
Please tell me which is better one?
One member can trash a story only once, just like one member is allowed only one vote/star per story.
Democracy has some benefits and some pitfalls as well.
Just tell me a better solution than to let our readers moderate the stories. We don`t want team of editors to police stories submitted. Not all stories deserve to be on homepage.
So there are two options, hire a team of editors to star or trash stories or let users do it.
Please tell me which is better one?
3 Stars
Some regulatory mechanism is needed for sure, and there are acceptable suggestions for the same in the Comments here.
If a member can ”trash” a story only once how does a story get ”trashed” in about ten minutes? Even the most popular writer on Instablogs is not read by that many readers within such a short time. (Should I believe that 14 members were waiting ready with their fingers on the left click button of their mouse to ”trash” that article so fast? 14 is the number of clicks needed to ”trash” an article, I am told.)
If a member can ”trash” a story only once how does a story get ”trashed” in about ten minutes? Even the most popular writer on Instablogs is not read by that many readers within such a short time. (Should I believe that 14 members were waiting ready with their fingers on the left click button of their mouse to ”trash” that article so fast? 14 is the number of clicks needed to ”trash” an article, I am told.)
6 Stars
It appears that there are quite a few people here on Insta who are opinionated way beyond what is permissible on Insta, or anywhere else for that matter. Advice, unasked for, is being forced down our throats till we are bloated with someone else’s views of life and the beyond. Individual views are often disrespected to the extent that we are deemed imbeciles, merely for disagreeing with another.
There are those of us who believe and those of us who don’t, and then there are the curious on either side of the fence.
I find my life not really worth living when I have to live it as someone else judges right..
There are those of us who believe and those of us who don’t, and then there are the curious on either side of the fence.
I find my life not really worth living when I have to live it as someone else judges right..
7 Stars
Jayashree,
Nobody is judging you on Instablogs.
You write an article - it goes to your ”MyBlog”.
Once it receives enough popular votes, it moves to homepage.
On the other hand, if it receives enough ”Trash votes”, it moves away from homepage.
But it always remain in your MyBlog.
Your friends, fans etc can always read your opinions in your ”MyBlog”.
Nobody is judging you on Instablogs.
You write an article - it goes to your ”MyBlog”.
Once it receives enough popular votes, it moves to homepage.
On the other hand, if it receives enough ”Trash votes”, it moves away from homepage.
But it always remain in your MyBlog.
Your friends, fans etc can always read your opinions in your ”MyBlog”.
6 Stars
@Nandini Thanks for letting me know that!
I understood from an earlier comment that when an article receives enough ’trash’ votes it is ’deleted’. I mean, I MISunderstood.
I understood from an earlier comment that when an article receives enough ’trash’ votes it is ’deleted’. I mean, I MISunderstood.
4 Stars
When the article is trashed no body can change or add anything in it and it is covered with a white film as something obscene. It will hurt you if you ever see that on your blog page.
6 Stars
It would certainly hurt me, Dr. Ratan. No doubt about it.
4 Stars
I can imagine the state of mind when one has to undergo such a situation.
5 Stars
I hope the necessary steps will be taken by Insatblog to avoid such a situation for anyone.
3 Stars
This white film will only come if you yourself has trash it.
If I trash a story, only I will see the white film on that story and nobody else or those who have trash the story.
I recommend a feature of untrashing a story also.
If I trash a story, only I will see the white film on that story and nobody else or those who have trash the story.
I recommend a feature of untrashing a story also.
4 Stars
Hi Nandini,
You are very much right that there shouldn’t be any specific editorial control in Instablogs taking its nature of citizen’s voice. But then there should be some kind of governance as they are doing....
One suggestion that I can view very much suitable is the TRASH option should only be limited to very specific users taking their history into count, who not only submit stories but also writes on a regular basis.
Because, if it is for all then for instance a group of people (like me and my friends) can eliminate a story without any cause; just due to the fact that they don’t want that particular story.
You are very much right that there shouldn’t be any specific editorial control in Instablogs taking its nature of citizen’s voice. But then there should be some kind of governance as they are doing....
One suggestion that I can view very much suitable is the TRASH option should only be limited to very specific users taking their history into count, who not only submit stories but also writes on a regular basis.
Because, if it is for all then for instance a group of people (like me and my friends) can eliminate a story without any cause; just due to the fact that they don’t want that particular story.
4 Stars
Why people break heart of others ? What kind of pleasure they enjoy in this cruel act of theirs?
May GOD bless them with proper and true sense.
May GOD bless them with proper and true sense.
2 Stars
@ Nandini
If I did that trash then I will never ask any one as Who Trashed it ?
If I did that trash then I will never ask any one as Who Trashed it ?
2 Stars
What is this? Will any one ever ”trash” his/her own story? It is always possible to edit or completely rewrite the story.
The transparent film cover (or, what to call it?) appears on the article page when it is trashed. I saw it on my article when it had been trashed by some one.
The transparent film cover (or, what to call it?) appears on the article page when it is trashed. I saw it on my article when it had been trashed by some one.
4 Stars
I am saying it could be a mistake.
As I have told you only one trash vote can`t remove a story. It needs multiple trash votes, and whenever somebody trashes a story/comments it disappears for them, only for them.
And as I can see, you are one of the Top Members on Instablogs, your stories to be trashed needs more negative votes than usual member stories.
As I have told you only one trash vote can`t remove a story. It needs multiple trash votes, and whenever somebody trashes a story/comments it disappears for them, only for them.
And as I can see, you are one of the Top Members on Instablogs, your stories to be trashed needs more negative votes than usual member stories.
7 Stars
Ratan's profile reads:
If you practice what you say then why the hell you are complaining so much? Think of it as God's own wish that some members trashed your posts.
:-D
BE HAPPY with what ever you have been granted by HIM!!!
If you practice what you say then why the hell you are complaining so much? Think of it as God's own wish that some members trashed your posts.
:-D
3 Stars
I am no doubt happy with what ever I am getting from people like you and HIM. The point is Instablogs should know how the community should behave.
1 Stars
Dear Dr. Ratan Saini ,
” Everyone has a viewpoint ” - the motto of Instablogs says all .The trash button goes against the very spirit of Instablogs .If you don’t like the article then simply ignore it .What’s the point in wasting time over it ?
If that’s not possible then form a panel of reputed members to decide whether an item is to be trashed or not . But even this very right should be used in the rarest of rare case .
It’s quite possible that some people ,in league with their vested interests , decide to use the trash button . In other words , the trash button can be misused by the wrong people .
” Everyone has a viewpoint ” - the motto of Instablogs says all .The trash button goes against the very spirit of Instablogs .If you don’t like the article then simply ignore it .What’s the point in wasting time over it ?
If that’s not possible then form a panel of reputed members to decide whether an item is to be trashed or not . But even this very right should be used in the rarest of rare case .
It’s quite possible that some people ,in league with their vested interests , decide to use the trash button . In other words , the trash button can be misused by the wrong people .
4 Stars
My view is face the world because its not your own article which you want to trash.
5 Stars
@Saini -
Dude, this translucent white film that veils a trashed post is called purdah.
Did you hear the song -
Purdah Hai Purdah, Purdeh Ke Pichhe, Purdah Nashin Hai
Purdah Nashin Ko Be-Purdah Na Kar Dun To
Elias Mera Nam Nahin Hai
Purdah Hai Purdah...
Click on the video to play it.
Cheers!
When the article is trashed no body can change or add anything in it and it is covered with a white film as something obscene.
Dude, this translucent white film that veils a trashed post is called purdah.
Did you hear the song -
Purdah Hai Purdah, Purdeh Ke Pichhe, Purdah Nashin Hai
Purdah Nashin Ko Be-Purdah Na Kar Dun To
Elias Mera Nam Nahin Hai
Purdah Hai Purdah...
Click on the video to play it.
Cheers!
3 Stars
I understand what you want to communicate.
But its public property one may not like to see but let others see and comment on.
But its public property one may not like to see but let others see and comment on.
6 Stars
Hi Arvind Illahabaadi -
So nice to see you back after a long time. I thought you spent the time studying Wren and Martin on how to punctuate properly because I sincerely believe (and sympathize with you) that you had to drop out of kindergarten. Unfortunately, you have not heeded my advice.
So nice to see you back after a long time. I thought you spent the time studying Wren and Martin on how to punctuate properly because I sincerely believe (and sympathize with you) that you had to drop out of kindergarten. Unfortunately, you have not heeded my advice.
4 Stars
I a happy to see old friends interacting through this article.
6 Stars
If what Nandini says is true then I am fine with it. Yes Jayashree, it seems that some people here are too opinionated, but that is the nature of the game.
4 Stars
The approach of a good society is live and let live.
5 Stars
like they say one man’s medicine could be another’s poison...opinions are thus!
as long as you don’t hurt sentiments unnecessarily i dont think democracy should have problem
as long as you don’t hurt sentiments unnecessarily i dont think democracy should have problem
3 Stars
If a person has true values and act accordingly the system can be good foe everyone except those who are behaving other way round.
6 Stars
Hey Dr. please check the uploaded image. And read the description to know my logic about why the trash option should be kept intact at Instablogs.
It all sums up to just one thing - if someone doesn’t find anything useful, he has every right to dispose it off in the garbage. Your articles are no exception!
It all sums up to just one thing - if someone doesn’t find anything useful, he has every right to dispose it off in the garbage. Your articles are no exception!
4 Stars
If you are the owner then only you can destroy but if it is in public domain and you destroy or kill then it is treated as murder and one has to face the punishments for it.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
4 Stars
Well..I still do not know how instablogs function and whether the editor or chief editor is qualified. Editor’s job is to edit but it does not mean he or she has to edit everything that is submitted. Once it happened to me that the work i posted got rejected even before it is queued. I tried twice. it seemed they just dont want it there. I sent it to my editor colleagues and what they said is somebody like editing very much and nothing wrong in the post. And one must see all kinda news given in the newsroom.Can’t they get decent ones? Most of them are ### rated. I honestly feel that instablogs is biased. When I asked them about this, they just kept mum.Now i feel so disheartened that I dont feel like posting anything. feels like my wings are broken:(
4 Stars
Well I have a practical suggection, please save a copy of your posts and try re-submitting. If gets ’trashed’ again. Put up the post on any other cj web-sites. I did that once. The one that was trashed here in minutes became ’picks’ of the day at the other web-site on the same day.
The ’trashed’ article can be re-cyled.
It does hurt when people reject but ’trash’ seems to be part of the blogging game here. Also all well-known writers have had to accept rejection slips in the beginning of their writing career.
The ’trashed’ article can be re-cyled.
It does hurt when people reject but ’trash’ seems to be part of the blogging game here. Also all well-known writers have had to accept rejection slips in the beginning of their writing career.
4 Stars
Trashing someone’s article is a clear indication that you can’t tolerate one’s view. It’s a sort of jealousy and hatred. I don’t know why people trash articles if they have every right and scope to present their views against of it. There should be a guard against this activity- who is trashing what.
2 Stars
There are people here in this community who can not read the truth.
I am writing these article for such people only.
The one Who can read the truth have already read it.
I am writing these article for such people only.
The one Who can read the truth have already read it.
4 Stars
I am in complete agreement with Dr. Saini. Almost no opinion is worth ’not being heard’. One may hear and ignore but not without hearing it. So, let everything be voiced and if it is indeed worth being trashed, it will eventually be subdued by saner voices.
2 Stars
I hope one day people of all types will be able to read the truth.
7 Stars
@ Dr. Ratan I’m Always Right Saini
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
And posting protest articles can not justify the importance of your Trash articles either!
Instead of crying hoarse over a rejection (by the mass), you should come up with good articles and prove your worth. It doesn’t suit a person of your caliber to engage the community members with your non-article (the current one).
If there is no check on such submissions (which include profane, useless, plagiarized, spam, or derogatory articles) very soon this platform will get stinking. And thats not a good idea, fail to woo me atleast.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
And posting protest articles can not justify the importance of your Trash articles either!
Instead of crying hoarse over a rejection (by the mass), you should come up with good articles and prove your worth. It doesn’t suit a person of your caliber to engage the community members with your non-article (the current one).
If there is no check on such submissions (which include profane, useless, plagiarized, spam, or derogatory articles) very soon this platform will get stinking. And thats not a good idea, fail to woo me atleast.
10 Stars
Dr. Ratan Saini, the self professed guru of Instablogs. You may have a huge fan following here thanks to your plagiarized material from almost all the religious books. Reminds me of the Pied Piper who led all the mice to the water body. Pied Piper however used original ideas. If getting stars does good to your self esteem and a ’trash’ hurts a man of your stature so much, I must say you are really weak as a writer and can’t handle criticism. We do not need the ’good words’ of ’great saints’ to be retold here and what readers would like to see is some relevant and original write ups. If one is truly interested in such ’priceless gems’ one can always go ahead and buy the original books. Seeking followers for yourself by private messaging people and pleading them to comment (which would mean starring and nodding heads to every word you copy from others)is not only childish, but also annoying. I have nothing against you or your articles but what you write are not articles!
Take the example of this article on this very page which has generated hundreds of comments. 2 statements and 3 questions. With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly. I restrained myself from commenting on your articles for I found them not only annoying but plain TRASH.
Hope you write sensible articles which present original ’good words’ and help us understand why we should choose your path to reach ’HIM’ by reading plagiarized content and ramblings.
Take the example of this article on this very page which has generated hundreds of comments. 2 statements and 3 questions. With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly. I restrained myself from commenting on your articles for I found them not only annoying but plain TRASH.
Hope you write sensible articles which present original ’good words’ and help us understand why we should choose your path to reach ’HIM’ by reading plagiarized content and ramblings.
5 Stars
*If getting stars does good to your self esteem and a ’trash’ hurts a man of your stature so much, I must say you are really weak as a writer and can’t handle criticism.*
*With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly.*
If only I could star this comment over and over and over...and over again, I know I would reach a place more beautiful than Heaven. But I can’t so I shall close my eyes, because a WISE and ENLIGHTENED man recently told me ”True beauty 1000000 times more beautiful than Heaven can be viewed with closed eyes.”
*With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly.*
If only I could star this comment over and over and over...and over again, I know I would reach a place more beautiful than Heaven. But I can’t so I shall close my eyes, because a WISE and ENLIGHTENED man recently told me ”True beauty 1000000 times more beautiful than Heaven can be viewed with closed eyes.”
3 Stars
Bravo Jaiyant! U have penned all the words what I wanted to say! I don’t want Instablogs to become a platform for plagiarised and pseudo secular articles, reeking with essence of spirituality. Everybody should have the freedom of choice, and for someone who proclaims to be way above us, the ignorant and the ’fallen’ lot, this mere trashing of an article should not have affected him so much..what say??
2 Stars
Wishing You all the Best with Thanks for your kind time and effort to write your comments!!!
3 Stars
Hello Ratan,
I have just found this article and would like to comment on it. The idea of any contibutor having the right to trash an article is ridiculous. It’s like a reader deciding what goes into Times of India online or any other news outlet.
It would never occur to me to trash anyone’s work, whether I agree with it or not. A lot of people work hard to keep this site online, and it’s sheer arrogance to imagine that one can decide, just because it suits them, to trash whatever they feel like.
On the other hand, maybe the ”trash?” button should forward the story to an editor, who decides. AND IF PEOPLE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE EDITORIAL LINE OF IB, THEY ARE FREE TO GO ELSEWHERE! Since when did people decide to control the expression of others? Answer; since dictatorships exist.
Trashing is not democratic, it’s anarchic censorship.......and that’s precisely why editors exist, to counter it.
Thanks for reading
I have just found this article and would like to comment on it. The idea of any contibutor having the right to trash an article is ridiculous. It’s like a reader deciding what goes into Times of India online or any other news outlet.
It would never occur to me to trash anyone’s work, whether I agree with it or not. A lot of people work hard to keep this site online, and it’s sheer arrogance to imagine that one can decide, just because it suits them, to trash whatever they feel like.
On the other hand, maybe the ”trash?” button should forward the story to an editor, who decides. AND IF PEOPLE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE EDITORIAL LINE OF IB, THEY ARE FREE TO GO ELSEWHERE! Since when did people decide to control the expression of others? Answer; since dictatorships exist.
Trashing is not democratic, it’s anarchic censorship.......and that’s precisely why editors exist, to counter it.
Thanks for reading
2 Stars
”maybe the ’trash’ button should forward the story to an editor, who decides.”
It’s a good idea.
:)
It’s a good idea.
:)
1 Stars
@ Michael C
Even the editor’s consent to trash the article should be accomapined by proper reasons .What if the dictatorship of crooked minds on Instablogs gets replaced by the dictatorship of editor ? Either limit the intervention of editor or come to frame the panel of reputed and sensible members to decide the fate of controversial article.Then the decision of the panel to trash the article,being accompained by proper reasons,should be put to vote.If the majority comes to ratify the decision of the panel members with proper reason only then the green signal to trash the article be given .
Even the editor’s consent to trash the article should be accomapined by proper reasons .What if the dictatorship of crooked minds on Instablogs gets replaced by the dictatorship of editor ? Either limit the intervention of editor or come to frame the panel of reputed and sensible members to decide the fate of controversial article.Then the decision of the panel to trash the article,being accompained by proper reasons,should be put to vote.If the majority comes to ratify the decision of the panel members with proper reason only then the green signal to trash the article be given .
2 Stars
This word ’trash’ is harsh enough to tell you that your ’thoughts or views’ are deleted.
But I guess, DIGG was clever enough to use ’bury’ instead of ’trashing someone’s opinion’. It is better if someone objects its presence by burying it.
So MANY synonyms to a better effect than to ’trash’, for example: entomb, inhume, etc...
There should be an ultimate delete also, just the rights should be the same voice from the originator of the opinion.
But I guess, DIGG was clever enough to use ’bury’ instead of ’trashing someone’s opinion’. It is better if someone objects its presence by burying it.
So MANY synonyms to a better effect than to ’trash’, for example: entomb, inhume, etc...
There should be an ultimate delete also, just the rights should be the same voice from the originator of the opinion.
2 Stars
It is common sense which every body needs to learn.
2 Stars
@ Arvind
Thank you for your reply. I couldn’t agree more with your concerns concerning the control of what is published and what is not on an internet site. They are legitimate.
But, if I may say so, we do live (or want to, in any case) in a society where free expression is allowed. This means that people also have the right to put up web sites which reflect their general thinking.
Fascists put up their sites. So What? Liberals and socialists too. Jews and muslims as well. THAT’S NORMAL. If you don’t like them, don’t go there!!
What is not normal, on the other hand, is a free-for-all where everyone wants to control the orientation of an internet site.
If someone wants to control what’s put up on a site, GREAT! ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS PUT UP A SITE OF THEIR OWN!! Bandwagon jumpers are everywhere. Not concerned enough to contribute, they behave like spoilt children. They break the toys. Too lazy to do the work, and too bourgois to have real convictions.
LET’S GET REAL HERE!!!!....
Thank you for your reply. I couldn’t agree more with your concerns concerning the control of what is published and what is not on an internet site. They are legitimate.
But, if I may say so, we do live (or want to, in any case) in a society where free expression is allowed. This means that people also have the right to put up web sites which reflect their general thinking.
Fascists put up their sites. So What? Liberals and socialists too. Jews and muslims as well. THAT’S NORMAL. If you don’t like them, don’t go there!!
What is not normal, on the other hand, is a free-for-all where everyone wants to control the orientation of an internet site.
If someone wants to control what’s put up on a site, GREAT! ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS PUT UP A SITE OF THEIR OWN!! Bandwagon jumpers are everywhere. Not concerned enough to contribute, they behave like spoilt children. They break the toys. Too lazy to do the work, and too bourgois to have real convictions.
LET’S GET REAL HERE!!!!....
2 Stars
@ Michael C ,
THE LONG AND SHORT OF TRASHING
I think there are some missing links . I have been on Instablogs for quite a long time now .I have come to realize that there is subtle attempts on the part of some denizens on Istablogs to clip the wings of some writers for the reasons best known to them .Like U.S. they are acting as a watchdog and like U.S. demolishing anyone who is not with them.They have adopted a certain pattern .Plant dubious stories about the person , spread bull-shit lies and if that’s not possible kill the very spirit of the writer via personal attacks enveloped in malicious intent.Instablogs ,of late ,has become idle platform for such distorted , crooked and derailed mindsets.
Cant’ they follow the simple rule that it’s best to ignore the piece if it dosen’t fit within your set of convictions.But that does not happpen. Some people start acting as ”Messiah ” even as they get exposed in an attempt to correct others.They are ready with their dos and don’ts ,fabrications of worse types and twisted logic.It’s not an attempt to silence these wicked people because that’s the very nature of world -to have all type of people . I am merely trying to create room for people who want to say something but are unable to do amid negative currents.
I have come across number of articles on Instablogs discussing size of penis , boobs etc. which for any sensible reader is shocking and appalling and devoid of any clinical purpose .I could have gone in for trash button but I didn’t do . Because it’s quite possible that such article are serving as a life-line for many on Instablogs who either want attention or seek pleausure .So whom am I to deny their quota of pleasure?Though my belief pattern has no place for these articles but this might not be the case with others.For them reading and endorsing such bogus article could be the top priority !!
In my eyes only those articles which are written to destroy the personna of writers , which are written with malicious intent aimed at defaming the writer and articles full of lies ,abuses and distotred facts are fit enough to be trashed but not without proper explanation and strict scrutiny .Let’s not downplay the image of anybody who is trying to resurrect certain values and beliefs with a right mindset. If you can’t digest such articles or for that mattter can’t come to terms with his/her popularity then please get away from his way instead of entering in personal vendetta with set of lies and prejudiced views .It’s my personal request not to turn Instablogs into a medium for settling personal scores . And if you are still intersted in locking bhorns please do it on merit and not via corrupt means .
THE LONG AND SHORT OF TRASHING
I think there are some missing links . I have been on Instablogs for quite a long time now .I have come to realize that there is subtle attempts on the part of some denizens on Istablogs to clip the wings of some writers for the reasons best known to them .Like U.S. they are acting as a watchdog and like U.S. demolishing anyone who is not with them.They have adopted a certain pattern .Plant dubious stories about the person , spread bull-shit lies and if that’s not possible kill the very spirit of the writer via personal attacks enveloped in malicious intent.Instablogs ,of late ,has become idle platform for such distorted , crooked and derailed mindsets.
Cant’ they follow the simple rule that it’s best to ignore the piece if it dosen’t fit within your set of convictions.But that does not happpen. Some people start acting as ”Messiah ” even as they get exposed in an attempt to correct others.They are ready with their dos and don’ts ,fabrications of worse types and twisted logic.It’s not an attempt to silence these wicked people because that’s the very nature of world -to have all type of people . I am merely trying to create room for people who want to say something but are unable to do amid negative currents.
I have come across number of articles on Instablogs discussing size of penis , boobs etc. which for any sensible reader is shocking and appalling and devoid of any clinical purpose .I could have gone in for trash button but I didn’t do . Because it’s quite possible that such article are serving as a life-line for many on Instablogs who either want attention or seek pleausure .So whom am I to deny their quota of pleasure?Though my belief pattern has no place for these articles but this might not be the case with others.For them reading and endorsing such bogus article could be the top priority !!
In my eyes only those articles which are written to destroy the personna of writers , which are written with malicious intent aimed at defaming the writer and articles full of lies ,abuses and distotred facts are fit enough to be trashed but not without proper explanation and strict scrutiny .Let’s not downplay the image of anybody who is trying to resurrect certain values and beliefs with a right mindset. If you can’t digest such articles or for that mattter can’t come to terms with his/her popularity then please get away from his way instead of entering in personal vendetta with set of lies and prejudiced views .It’s my personal request not to turn Instablogs into a medium for settling personal scores . And if you are still intersted in locking bhorns please do it on merit and not via corrupt means .
1 Stars
Now if any of your articles gets trashed please post that here.
1 Stars
Exactly, a trash bin is the best place for trash!
Local Opinions (105)
8 Stars
I too agree with Dr. Saini. Members should share their views and comments instead of simply dump the article
4 Stars
Such a golden words written by Dr. Ratan are trashed by some one shows the mindset of people arround here.
How this community can grow and devlop as a leadeing blog space if we have such closed minded people?
How this community can grow and devlop as a leadeing blog space if we have such closed minded people?
7 Stars
The value of your articles is not in the criticsm of others but in the content of your subject. Kindly don’t get disheartened. You are a good writer. We appreciate your articles.
4 Stars
Even I have faced this...
It is unfair to trash articles in a forum like Instablogs where all are free to comment and choose what to read and what not to read.
It is unfair to trash articles in a forum like Instablogs where all are free to comment and choose what to read and what not to read.
5 Stars
That is enormous work .you are looking into some excellent thoughts which will do world of good for instablogs.I totally agree with your point ,when we are allowed to present our views then why TRASH ?
4 Stars
This is not a good sign for a good community which wants to grow and do some thing for the society.
I deeply condemn such an act and would request the administrators of the blog to remove such an option of trashing any article. Only the editors should have any such right that two they can propose to the chief editor and on approval of the same any article may be trashed.
What other members can do is, they should support this kind of procedure or arrangement to trash any article, as mentioned above.
I deeply condemn such an act and would request the administrators of the blog to remove such an option of trashing any article. Only the editors should have any such right that two they can propose to the chief editor and on approval of the same any article may be trashed.
What other members can do is, they should support this kind of procedure or arrangement to trash any article, as mentioned above.
4 Stars
I also agree to such an administrative option for trashing any article popular or upcoming.
Only the Chief Editor should have a right to trash any article, prosed by members, star members or regional or super editors.
The concerned persons in management should look into this and implement the same at the earliest for the true growth of the Instablogs.
Only the Chief Editor should have a right to trash any article, prosed by members, star members or regional or super editors.
The concerned persons in management should look into this and implement the same at the earliest for the true growth of the Instablogs.
4 Stars
Looking forward to such an arrangement from Instablogs.
8 Stars
Hello Dr Ratan, although I completely agree with what you have said that Instablogs should be the platform for healthy debate, and people should have the freedom of choice to read or not to read an article, I want to humbly point out that if Instablogs becomes just a platform for articles with religious overtones and spiritual bent, it would loose its essence. Your articles are very thought provoking, deeply spiritual, and there can be thousands of people around the globe who swear by them. But they should not take the stance of preaching and enlightening the whole world. Then the conflict starts, and people have a tendency to dump them in the trash can. Infact, you personally had asked me to give my comments on some of your articles, but I preferred to keep quiet, as I do not agree with some of your views. As Madhuri has aptly said, its the freedom of choice!
4 Stars
If one is not agreeing with any article he can simply write his views and the reasons.
But to trash any article which is like by many is shear indiscipline on part of the person who is doing it and the management of the blog administrators.
If you write some good article and they are trashed by some one how you feel about it?
But to trash any article which is like by many is shear indiscipline on part of the person who is doing it and the management of the blog administrators.
If you write some good article and they are trashed by some one how you feel about it?
9 Stars
I also remember trashing one of your articles yesterday. It was a poem on Saint Kabir.
The poem was good but has nothing to do with news.
I think we need groups on Instablogs, where people share stuff other than news.
Poems can`t be mixed with news and op-ed pieces.
The poem was good but has nothing to do with news.
I think we need groups on Instablogs, where people share stuff other than news.
Poems can`t be mixed with news and op-ed pieces.
6 Stars
An Article is not required to be news, if I understand instablogs policy.
4 Stars
This is too bad on part of fello members to delet popular artilces like this and admin should look into the problem so that such thing do not repeat any time in future.
5 Stars
I dont get it. Why would someone do this? I mean can you stop people from thinking something? And if we cant then whats the point of stopping them from expressing?
I dont know what instablogs policy is but if this is how people are gonna react, i will be trashed out of this community soon... lol
I dont know what instablogs policy is but if this is how people are gonna react, i will be trashed out of this community soon... lol
5 Stars
Very true, there will be no good writers and readers on this blog space if this contnues like this.
5 Stars
I am waiting for a response from Instablogs about a concrete reply and will surely follow your suggestion.
4 Stars
I think such a community can not progress who wants to close the eyes and want take away the pen from noble writers.
Alas !!! Where we are heading to ?
.......
A coward society which do not want to read the truth.
Alas !!! Where we are heading to ?
.......
A coward society which do not want to read the truth.
6 Stars
True!!!
I was told we cud express here whatever we wanted. But if this forum is meant for the news of ”politics” alone, then adieu from my side, as to me politics is the shallowest thing on earth!
Dr. Ratan is sharing beautiful things; its ugly to trash them. You dont agree, fine, but trashing implies trashing someone’s heart... heart is where God dwells...
”Bay shak Mandir, Masjid touro Bulle Shah ye Kehta
Pyar bhara dil na touro, is mein Eshwer rehta!”
Dr. Ratan, you have a heart full of love and know that I love u and am with you!!!
I was told we cud express here whatever we wanted. But if this forum is meant for the news of ”politics” alone, then adieu from my side, as to me politics is the shallowest thing on earth!
Dr. Ratan is sharing beautiful things; its ugly to trash them. You dont agree, fine, but trashing implies trashing someone’s heart... heart is where God dwells...
”Bay shak Mandir, Masjid touro Bulle Shah ye Kehta
Pyar bhara dil na touro, is mein Eshwer rehta!”
Dr. Ratan, you have a heart full of love and know that I love u and am with you!!!
8 Stars
I think everything is working perfect here at Instablogs. I read all articles of Dr. Saini, all are excellent pieces. However, what’s the point in just rewriting the “good words of Great Saints” here. If it’s related to the context of any story, it’s fine, but otherwise I don’t see any point in reposting all religious Almanacs of the world here. Be original!
5 Stars
Question is if Insatblog has no such prohibition on such postings then who has the right to tarsh the article liked by so mant including you?
6 Stars
Trashing someone’s articles is nothing but an act of cowardice. This act simply reflects the doer’s weak state of mind! It’s like damaging a painter’s painting, just because you yourself can’t paint!
Instablogs should simply ask the person trashing somone’s article to give an appropriate reason for doing so! and only if they are able to give any reasonable reason for doing so, should the article be trashed!
Instablogs should simply ask the person trashing somone’s article to give an appropriate reason for doing so! and only if they are able to give any reasonable reason for doing so, should the article be trashed!
5 Stars
Thats right !!
When Instablogs has open policy and allow any article to be posted and liked by members than what is the justification that which gives right of deleting an article.
If it is desired to control the quality of articles then let it be referred first to the editor and then on its approval it may be published. But once any one can freely anything then how one can delete the same without any valid rule or reason?
I request Instablog administration to please clarify this point and let everyone know the change, if any, in this policy of trashing?
When Instablogs has open policy and allow any article to be posted and liked by members than what is the justification that which gives right of deleting an article.
If it is desired to control the quality of articles then let it be referred first to the editor and then on its approval it may be published. But once any one can freely anything then how one can delete the same without any valid rule or reason?
I request Instablog administration to please clarify this point and let everyone know the change, if any, in this policy of trashing?
8 Stars
Naheeeeeeeee ye naheeee ho saktaaaaaaa
Azadi mere dulhan hai... oh sorry... azadi mera dulha hai...lol
Azadi mere dulhan hai... oh sorry... azadi mera dulha hai...lol
4 Stars
I agree to the comment of Dr. Ratan Saini above that a clear cut policy on trashing should be published by Insatblogs.
5 Stars
Yes, there should be no trashing on any article which is allowed to be submitted.
7 Stars
I think there should be a special section for articles out of news or poem or personal stories where users can simply send their views. Let them be published completely unedited, let them to raise their voice but no option for TRASH.
However, DELETE option is also necessary but in the rarest case, and that should be in the hands of chief editor.
Users can simply inform the editorial desk, if s/he finds anything objectionable.
So NO TRASH PLZ...
However, DELETE option is also necessary but in the rarest case, and that should be in the hands of chief editor.
Users can simply inform the editorial desk, if s/he finds anything objectionable.
So NO TRASH PLZ...
3 Stars
The Instablogs has agreed to do the needful and have informed to me that there will be strict control on the article trashing possibility.
4 Stars
I am against Chief Editor.
People should decide what is good or what is bad.
I don`t want Instablogs to be a voice of a single guy (read Chief Editor).
Infact Instablogs doesn’t have a voice of its own. We let people be our voice.
People should decide what is good or what is bad.
I don`t want Instablogs to be a voice of a single guy (read Chief Editor).
Infact Instablogs doesn’t have a voice of its own. We let people be our voice.
7 Stars
WOW.
although I am new to blogging and to INSTABLOGS, I must live in a cave. I didn’t even know it was possible to trash an article, and knowing it is now, I can’t fathom the idea. I will not lie and say I am an avid reader of Dr. Ratan’s work, but after seeing his post, I had to investigate the commotion. Whether the few readers responsible for the destruction of his work would like to admit it or even feel the same way, Dr. Ratan’s work is obviously, due to his stars and comments ON EVERY ARTICLE, doing something right in MANY readers eyes. It seems rather ”almighty”, in my humble eyes to take that gift from someone else simply because one chose to think it was ”inappropiatly” categorized. Do the same people rip out pages of novels, encyclopedias, and other texts they have no intrest for? Are they the ones that rip out pages of magazines left for ALL patients to read in the doctor’s office? I had no idea as a general rule for blogs and otherwise we were FORCED to read each and every article..(I’ve got my work cut out for me). Haven’t they ever heard of Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder or how about this one: ONE MANS TRASH IS ANOTHER MANS TREASURE?
although I am new to blogging and to INSTABLOGS, I must live in a cave. I didn’t even know it was possible to trash an article, and knowing it is now, I can’t fathom the idea. I will not lie and say I am an avid reader of Dr. Ratan’s work, but after seeing his post, I had to investigate the commotion. Whether the few readers responsible for the destruction of his work would like to admit it or even feel the same way, Dr. Ratan’s work is obviously, due to his stars and comments ON EVERY ARTICLE, doing something right in MANY readers eyes. It seems rather ”almighty”, in my humble eyes to take that gift from someone else simply because one chose to think it was ”inappropiatly” categorized. Do the same people rip out pages of novels, encyclopedias, and other texts they have no intrest for? Are they the ones that rip out pages of magazines left for ALL patients to read in the doctor’s office? I had no idea as a general rule for blogs and otherwise we were FORCED to read each and every article..(I’ve got my work cut out for me). Haven’t they ever heard of Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder or how about this one: ONE MANS TRASH IS ANOTHER MANS TREASURE?
3 Stars
This is called negative and destructive approach to life and people with this approach will never be able to enjoy the fruits of true happiness.
4 Stars
I always wondered what the trash button meant. I assumed, though have never used, that it was just to remove it from an individuals home page.
and as Oscar says, if you aren’t interested just don’t read.
and as Oscar says, if you aren’t interested just don’t read.
4 Stars
That is the right way. I my self don’t read so many articles which talk about funny things which has no relevance for me.
5 Stars
What about all good words about freedom of expression. Dr. Saini’s articles are posted in the lifestyle channel and I believe that poems written by great people affects our lives. There is more in our lifestyle than only latest fashion trends.
4 Stars
I find there are people like you here who knows the right answer to the problem and understand the views of a writer.
13 Stars
Dr. Saini,
You are very good in playing to the gallery, aren't you? You have all the freedom to publish your stories without being trashed. I gather that stories are buried when a certain number of users 'trash' it. It is not possible for only one member to trash a story and bury it as it seems to have happened with some of your posts.
It is the community that makes your post reach the popular section of the homepage and it is the community that removes it from there. The power is with the community and not with the individual. So you might find some of your stories being made popular only to find their way in the trash can the next moment.
The irony is that only popular stories become conspicuous (by reaching the popular section of the homepage), and only conspicuous stories are trashed!
So what you feel about your stories are not exactly what the reality is. Contrary to being popular, your stories actually proved to be unpopular and hence, trashed.
Hope you will feel a lot better now.
You are very good in playing to the gallery, aren't you? You have all the freedom to publish your stories without being trashed. I gather that stories are buried when a certain number of users 'trash' it. It is not possible for only one member to trash a story and bury it as it seems to have happened with some of your posts.
It is the community that makes your post reach the popular section of the homepage and it is the community that removes it from there. The power is with the community and not with the individual. So you might find some of your stories being made popular only to find their way in the trash can the next moment.
The irony is that only popular stories become conspicuous (by reaching the popular section of the homepage), and only conspicuous stories are trashed!
So what you feel about your stories are not exactly what the reality is. Contrary to being popular, your stories actually proved to be unpopular and hence, trashed.
Hope you will feel a lot better now.
4 Stars
If story is not popular it remain in upcoming for a given span of time say seven days and after that it is removed automatically.
10 Stars
Hello Dr. Saini,
If you pay attention, you will see three more buttons besides the ’Trash’ button. Now, I would like to say just one thing - if you are prepared to celebrate the first three buttons, then you should also be strong enough to accept the importance of the fourth button ie. the ’Trash’ button.
Its got to do with freedom of choice and any intelligent person like you should know that ’your treasure is not always treasure for others’..and whats not treasure is TRASH.
Personally I feel you should try to nail a good publishing house and make a paperback of your poems, both original and lifted. And yeah, be well aware about the copyright issue.
BTW, I’m going to exercise my right to hit one of the four buttons at the top right corner of this post. Any guesses Dr. Saini, about the button I’m gonna hit?
If you pay attention, you will see three more buttons besides the ’Trash’ button. Now, I would like to say just one thing - if you are prepared to celebrate the first three buttons, then you should also be strong enough to accept the importance of the fourth button ie. the ’Trash’ button.
Its got to do with freedom of choice and any intelligent person like you should know that ’your treasure is not always treasure for others’..and whats not treasure is TRASH.
Personally I feel you should try to nail a good publishing house and make a paperback of your poems, both original and lifted. And yeah, be well aware about the copyright issue.
BTW, I’m going to exercise my right to hit one of the four buttons at the top right corner of this post. Any guesses Dr. Saini, about the button I’m gonna hit?
4 Stars
I have given very clear logic about why trash should not be allowed. Face the world instead of closing your eyes.
7 Stars
Trash feature is important and it should remain there. What if someone posted illegal, rumor, hatred, pornographic material?
This feature helps users to keep Instablogs safe, clean and up to date.
Trash votes helps users in moderating the homepage. Again I repeating it takes more than one trash votes to remove article from the homepage.
If your article is trashed, it means multiple people have voted against you.
This feature helps users to keep Instablogs safe, clean and up to date.
Trash votes helps users in moderating the homepage. Again I repeating it takes more than one trash votes to remove article from the homepage.
If your article is trashed, it means multiple people have voted against you.
6 Stars
Completely agree with you and Nandini. Infact I can’t fathom why an emancipated soul like Dr Ratan will be influenced and hurt by such petty things as to who has trashed his articles? I thought he’s way above all these petty things...LOL:p!!!
6 Stars
Wah Bhai!
Ratan, you are essentially trying to say that "if you like my story comment and star it and if you don't like my story just say why you didn't like/ignore/go away".
Why sir?
If you love the bouquets so much you must also learn to receive brickbats. How many of your stories are being trashed as opposed not to have been trashed? I think only about 2-3?
Ratan, you are essentially trying to say that "if you like my story comment and star it and if you don't like my story just say why you didn't like/ignore/go away".
Why sir?
If you love the bouquets so much you must also learn to receive brickbats. How many of your stories are being trashed as opposed not to have been trashed? I think only about 2-3?
4 Stars
One should write their views opposing what is written in a proper way. If the article is not there what and where are the brickbats going to strike?
6 Stars
If an article is trashed, it is not deleted. It is only removed from the homepage. It remains in your MyBlog.
And it takes more than one vote to get your article trashed. Just like it takes more than one vote to get any article popular.
And it takes more than one vote to get your article trashed. Just like it takes more than one vote to get any article popular.
5 Stars
The TRASH feature is meant to serve a good purpose. But it is also used for other purposes, like “doing away” with an article the “trasher” doesn’t like or “suppressing” the views of a writer whom one doesn’t like, etc.
It should be made mandatory for the “trasher” to give two reasons for his/her action and these reasons should be made public along with the identity of the “trasher” on the article page. This may bring down instances of unnecessary “trashing”.
One of my articles also was “trashed’ by some one. But when I contacted the Instablogs Team, they found the article good, “untrashed” it and moved it to the Home page. You can read it here: Will the Communists support the Congress-led government if Manmohan Singh is replaced?
It is clear that some well laid rules are needed in this connection.
Instablogs may make a separate section available for philosophical deliberations, poems, religious discourses, etc. as Deepak has suggested. And as he has said, the “TRASH” option should be in the hands of the chief editor, who may act on receiving a certain number of “TRASH requests” from Community members.
It should be made mandatory for the “trasher” to give two reasons for his/her action and these reasons should be made public along with the identity of the “trasher” on the article page. This may bring down instances of unnecessary “trashing”.
One of my articles also was “trashed’ by some one. But when I contacted the Instablogs Team, they found the article good, “untrashed” it and moved it to the Home page. You can read it here: Will the Communists support the Congress-led government if Manmohan Singh is replaced?
It is clear that some well laid rules are needed in this connection.
Instablogs may make a separate section available for philosophical deliberations, poems, religious discourses, etc. as Deepak has suggested. And as he has said, the “TRASH” option should be in the hands of the chief editor, who may act on receiving a certain number of “TRASH requests” from Community members.
4 Stars
Your views provide clear indication of what should be the system.
7 Stars
Instablogs doesn`t have Chief Editor. Please leave editorial tyranny for traditional media only.
Here’s all members are equal. They can be writers, editors or moderators.
”TRASH” option is in and will remain in hand of members.
Here’s all members are equal. They can be writers, editors or moderators.
”TRASH” option is in and will remain in hand of members.
4 Stars
It may be seen here as how people behave in so different ways. Forgetting the true sense of right and wrong.
8 Stars
An article can be trashed by any registered member. Once it receives enough ”trash votes” it moves away from the homepage.
This is same way how an article get popular and moves to homepage.
There is no Editorial control over it. But if you are a popular writer like Dr. Saini, who is a Super Editor, then his articles needs more than few trashes to get removed.
Democracy has negative shades as well.
*But look on the other hand 44 comments, you have got a great community build around your opinions.
This is same way how an article get popular and moves to homepage.
There is no Editorial control over it. But if you are a popular writer like Dr. Saini, who is a Super Editor, then his articles needs more than few trashes to get removed.
Democracy has negative shades as well.
*But look on the other hand 44 comments, you have got a great community build around your opinions.
5 Stars
Dear Nandini,
My article which was “trashed” (pl. see my Comment above) was trashed within less than 10 minutes of posting it on Instablogs, and when the article was still in the Upcoming section.
It was easy to understand it had been “trashed” by a person who had been infuriated by my Comments (and those of some other well informed members) in the ongoing discussion on an article at that time (the number of Comments had crossed a hundred). The inability to take part in a discussion with an unbiased and objective mindset led the person to “trash” my news based article that was in no way unfit for publication.
I don’t think 14 members had read that article within 10 minutes and all the 14 found it unfit or objectionable. I think, it is possible for any one member to “trash” an article, clicking the mouse sufficient number of times.
Democracy doesn’t permit one person to hurt another, or empower one person to prevent another from expressing his/her views. The suggestions made here, by a number of members, to introduce some regulations about the use of the TRASH feature are valid and they deserve consideration. ”Regulations” are the very foundation of ”civilization” and they need not be seen as a form of ”tyranny”.
:)
My article which was “trashed” (pl. see my Comment above) was trashed within less than 10 minutes of posting it on Instablogs, and when the article was still in the Upcoming section.
It was easy to understand it had been “trashed” by a person who had been infuriated by my Comments (and those of some other well informed members) in the ongoing discussion on an article at that time (the number of Comments had crossed a hundred). The inability to take part in a discussion with an unbiased and objective mindset led the person to “trash” my news based article that was in no way unfit for publication.
I don’t think 14 members had read that article within 10 minutes and all the 14 found it unfit or objectionable. I think, it is possible for any one member to “trash” an article, clicking the mouse sufficient number of times.
Democracy doesn’t permit one person to hurt another, or empower one person to prevent another from expressing his/her views. The suggestions made here, by a number of members, to introduce some regulations about the use of the TRASH feature are valid and they deserve consideration. ”Regulations” are the very foundation of ”civilization” and they need not be seen as a form of ”tyranny”.
:)
4 Stars
@ Paulraj
I am happy to read your explanation of the reality one experiences. But there are people in this world who can not read the truth and want to delete it.
Thanks for taking time off to write on my article.
I am happy to read your explanation of the reality one experiences. But there are people in this world who can not read the truth and want to delete it.
Thanks for taking time off to write on my article.
5 Stars
Thank you Dr. Ratan!
What needs to be said, must be said.
What needs to be said, must be said.
3 Stars
@ R.M.Paulraj
One member can trash a story only once, just like one member is allowed only one vote/star per story.
Democracy has some benefits and some pitfalls as well.
Just tell me a better solution than to let our readers moderate the stories. We don`t want team of editors to police stories submitted. Not all stories deserve to be on homepage.
So there are two options, hire a team of editors to star or trash stories or let users do it.
Please tell me which is better one?
One member can trash a story only once, just like one member is allowed only one vote/star per story.
Democracy has some benefits and some pitfalls as well.
Just tell me a better solution than to let our readers moderate the stories. We don`t want team of editors to police stories submitted. Not all stories deserve to be on homepage.
So there are two options, hire a team of editors to star or trash stories or let users do it.
Please tell me which is better one?
3 Stars
Some regulatory mechanism is needed for sure, and there are acceptable suggestions for the same in the Comments here.
If a member can ”trash” a story only once how does a story get ”trashed” in about ten minutes? Even the most popular writer on Instablogs is not read by that many readers within such a short time. (Should I believe that 14 members were waiting ready with their fingers on the left click button of their mouse to ”trash” that article so fast? 14 is the number of clicks needed to ”trash” an article, I am told.)
If a member can ”trash” a story only once how does a story get ”trashed” in about ten minutes? Even the most popular writer on Instablogs is not read by that many readers within such a short time. (Should I believe that 14 members were waiting ready with their fingers on the left click button of their mouse to ”trash” that article so fast? 14 is the number of clicks needed to ”trash” an article, I am told.)
6 Stars
It appears that there are quite a few people here on Insta who are opinionated way beyond what is permissible on Insta, or anywhere else for that matter. Advice, unasked for, is being forced down our throats till we are bloated with someone else’s views of life and the beyond. Individual views are often disrespected to the extent that we are deemed imbeciles, merely for disagreeing with another.
There are those of us who believe and those of us who don’t, and then there are the curious on either side of the fence.
I find my life not really worth living when I have to live it as someone else judges right..
There are those of us who believe and those of us who don’t, and then there are the curious on either side of the fence.
I find my life not really worth living when I have to live it as someone else judges right..
7 Stars
Jayashree,
Nobody is judging you on Instablogs.
You write an article - it goes to your ”MyBlog”.
Once it receives enough popular votes, it moves to homepage.
On the other hand, if it receives enough ”Trash votes”, it moves away from homepage.
But it always remain in your MyBlog.
Your friends, fans etc can always read your opinions in your ”MyBlog”.
Nobody is judging you on Instablogs.
You write an article - it goes to your ”MyBlog”.
Once it receives enough popular votes, it moves to homepage.
On the other hand, if it receives enough ”Trash votes”, it moves away from homepage.
But it always remain in your MyBlog.
Your friends, fans etc can always read your opinions in your ”MyBlog”.
6 Stars
@Nandini Thanks for letting me know that!
I understood from an earlier comment that when an article receives enough ’trash’ votes it is ’deleted’. I mean, I MISunderstood.
I understood from an earlier comment that when an article receives enough ’trash’ votes it is ’deleted’. I mean, I MISunderstood.
4 Stars
When the article is trashed no body can change or add anything in it and it is covered with a white film as something obscene. It will hurt you if you ever see that on your blog page.
6 Stars
It would certainly hurt me, Dr. Ratan. No doubt about it.
4 Stars
I can imagine the state of mind when one has to undergo such a situation.
5 Stars
I hope the necessary steps will be taken by Insatblog to avoid such a situation for anyone.
3 Stars
This white film will only come if you yourself has trash it.
If I trash a story, only I will see the white film on that story and nobody else or those who have trash the story.
I recommend a feature of untrashing a story also.
If I trash a story, only I will see the white film on that story and nobody else or those who have trash the story.
I recommend a feature of untrashing a story also.
4 Stars
Hi Nandini,
You are very much right that there shouldn’t be any specific editorial control in Instablogs taking its nature of citizen’s voice. But then there should be some kind of governance as they are doing....
One suggestion that I can view very much suitable is the TRASH option should only be limited to very specific users taking their history into count, who not only submit stories but also writes on a regular basis.
Because, if it is for all then for instance a group of people (like me and my friends) can eliminate a story without any cause; just due to the fact that they don’t want that particular story.
You are very much right that there shouldn’t be any specific editorial control in Instablogs taking its nature of citizen’s voice. But then there should be some kind of governance as they are doing....
One suggestion that I can view very much suitable is the TRASH option should only be limited to very specific users taking their history into count, who not only submit stories but also writes on a regular basis.
Because, if it is for all then for instance a group of people (like me and my friends) can eliminate a story without any cause; just due to the fact that they don’t want that particular story.
4 Stars
Why people break heart of others ? What kind of pleasure they enjoy in this cruel act of theirs?
May GOD bless them with proper and true sense.
May GOD bless them with proper and true sense.
2 Stars
@ Nandini
If I did that trash then I will never ask any one as Who Trashed it ?
If I did that trash then I will never ask any one as Who Trashed it ?
2 Stars
What is this? Will any one ever ”trash” his/her own story? It is always possible to edit or completely rewrite the story.
The transparent film cover (or, what to call it?) appears on the article page when it is trashed. I saw it on my article when it had been trashed by some one.
The transparent film cover (or, what to call it?) appears on the article page when it is trashed. I saw it on my article when it had been trashed by some one.
4 Stars
I am saying it could be a mistake.
As I have told you only one trash vote can`t remove a story. It needs multiple trash votes, and whenever somebody trashes a story/comments it disappears for them, only for them.
And as I can see, you are one of the Top Members on Instablogs, your stories to be trashed needs more negative votes than usual member stories.
As I have told you only one trash vote can`t remove a story. It needs multiple trash votes, and whenever somebody trashes a story/comments it disappears for them, only for them.
And as I can see, you are one of the Top Members on Instablogs, your stories to be trashed needs more negative votes than usual member stories.
7 Stars
Ratan's profile reads:
If you practice what you say then why the hell you are complaining so much? Think of it as God's own wish that some members trashed your posts.
:-D
BE HAPPY with what ever you have been granted by HIM!!!
If you practice what you say then why the hell you are complaining so much? Think of it as God's own wish that some members trashed your posts.
:-D
3 Stars
I am no doubt happy with what ever I am getting from people like you and HIM. The point is Instablogs should know how the community should behave.
1 Stars
Dear Dr. Ratan Saini ,
” Everyone has a viewpoint ” - the motto of Instablogs says all .The trash button goes against the very spirit of Instablogs .If you don’t like the article then simply ignore it .What’s the point in wasting time over it ?
If that’s not possible then form a panel of reputed members to decide whether an item is to be trashed or not . But even this very right should be used in the rarest of rare case .
It’s quite possible that some people ,in league with their vested interests , decide to use the trash button . In other words , the trash button can be misused by the wrong people .
” Everyone has a viewpoint ” - the motto of Instablogs says all .The trash button goes against the very spirit of Instablogs .If you don’t like the article then simply ignore it .What’s the point in wasting time over it ?
If that’s not possible then form a panel of reputed members to decide whether an item is to be trashed or not . But even this very right should be used in the rarest of rare case .
It’s quite possible that some people ,in league with their vested interests , decide to use the trash button . In other words , the trash button can be misused by the wrong people .
4 Stars
My view is face the world because its not your own article which you want to trash.
5 Stars
@Saini -
Dude, this translucent white film that veils a trashed post is called purdah.
Did you hear the song -
Purdah Hai Purdah, Purdeh Ke Pichhe, Purdah Nashin Hai
Purdah Nashin Ko Be-Purdah Na Kar Dun To
Elias Mera Nam Nahin Hai
Purdah Hai Purdah...
Click on the video to play it.
Cheers!
When the article is trashed no body can change or add anything in it and it is covered with a white film as something obscene.
Dude, this translucent white film that veils a trashed post is called purdah.
Did you hear the song -
Purdah Hai Purdah, Purdeh Ke Pichhe, Purdah Nashin Hai
Purdah Nashin Ko Be-Purdah Na Kar Dun To
Elias Mera Nam Nahin Hai
Purdah Hai Purdah...
Click on the video to play it.
Cheers!
3 Stars
I understand what you want to communicate.
But its public property one may not like to see but let others see and comment on.
But its public property one may not like to see but let others see and comment on.
6 Stars
Hi Arvind Illahabaadi -
So nice to see you back after a long time. I thought you spent the time studying Wren and Martin on how to punctuate properly because I sincerely believe (and sympathize with you) that you had to drop out of kindergarten. Unfortunately, you have not heeded my advice.
So nice to see you back after a long time. I thought you spent the time studying Wren and Martin on how to punctuate properly because I sincerely believe (and sympathize with you) that you had to drop out of kindergarten. Unfortunately, you have not heeded my advice.
4 Stars
I a happy to see old friends interacting through this article.
6 Stars
If what Nandini says is true then I am fine with it. Yes Jayashree, it seems that some people here are too opinionated, but that is the nature of the game.
5 Stars
like they say one man’s medicine could be another’s poison...opinions are thus!
as long as you don’t hurt sentiments unnecessarily i dont think democracy should have problem
as long as you don’t hurt sentiments unnecessarily i dont think democracy should have problem
3 Stars
If a person has true values and act accordingly the system can be good foe everyone except those who are behaving other way round.
6 Stars
Hey Dr. please check the uploaded image. And read the description to know my logic about why the trash option should be kept intact at Instablogs.
It all sums up to just one thing - if someone doesn’t find anything useful, he has every right to dispose it off in the garbage. Your articles are no exception!
It all sums up to just one thing - if someone doesn’t find anything useful, he has every right to dispose it off in the garbage. Your articles are no exception!
4 Stars
If you are the owner then only you can destroy but if it is in public domain and you destroy or kill then it is treated as murder and one has to face the punishments for it.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
4 Stars
Well..I still do not know how instablogs function and whether the editor or chief editor is qualified. Editor’s job is to edit but it does not mean he or she has to edit everything that is submitted. Once it happened to me that the work i posted got rejected even before it is queued. I tried twice. it seemed they just dont want it there. I sent it to my editor colleagues and what they said is somebody like editing very much and nothing wrong in the post. And one must see all kinda news given in the newsroom.Can’t they get decent ones? Most of them are ### rated. I honestly feel that instablogs is biased. When I asked them about this, they just kept mum.Now i feel so disheartened that I dont feel like posting anything. feels like my wings are broken:(
4 Stars
Well I have a practical suggection, please save a copy of your posts and try re-submitting. If gets ’trashed’ again. Put up the post on any other cj web-sites. I did that once. The one that was trashed here in minutes became ’picks’ of the day at the other web-site on the same day.
The ’trashed’ article can be re-cyled.
It does hurt when people reject but ’trash’ seems to be part of the blogging game here. Also all well-known writers have had to accept rejection slips in the beginning of their writing career.
The ’trashed’ article can be re-cyled.
It does hurt when people reject but ’trash’ seems to be part of the blogging game here. Also all well-known writers have had to accept rejection slips in the beginning of their writing career.
4 Stars
Trashing someone’s article is a clear indication that you can’t tolerate one’s view. It’s a sort of jealousy and hatred. I don’t know why people trash articles if they have every right and scope to present their views against of it. There should be a guard against this activity- who is trashing what.
2 Stars
There are people here in this community who can not read the truth.
I am writing these article for such people only.
The one Who can read the truth have already read it.
I am writing these article for such people only.
The one Who can read the truth have already read it.
4 Stars
I am in complete agreement with Dr. Saini. Almost no opinion is worth ’not being heard’. One may hear and ignore but not without hearing it. So, let everything be voiced and if it is indeed worth being trashed, it will eventually be subdued by saner voices.
2 Stars
I hope one day people of all types will be able to read the truth.
7 Stars
@ Dr. Ratan I’m Always Right Saini
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
And posting protest articles can not justify the importance of your Trash articles either!
Instead of crying hoarse over a rejection (by the mass), you should come up with good articles and prove your worth. It doesn’t suit a person of your caliber to engage the community members with your non-article (the current one).
If there is no check on such submissions (which include profane, useless, plagiarized, spam, or derogatory articles) very soon this platform will get stinking. And thats not a good idea, fail to woo me atleast.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
And posting protest articles can not justify the importance of your Trash articles either!
Instead of crying hoarse over a rejection (by the mass), you should come up with good articles and prove your worth. It doesn’t suit a person of your caliber to engage the community members with your non-article (the current one).
If there is no check on such submissions (which include profane, useless, plagiarized, spam, or derogatory articles) very soon this platform will get stinking. And thats not a good idea, fail to woo me atleast.
10 Stars
Dr. Ratan Saini, the self professed guru of Instablogs. You may have a huge fan following here thanks to your plagiarized material from almost all the religious books. Reminds me of the Pied Piper who led all the mice to the water body. Pied Piper however used original ideas. If getting stars does good to your self esteem and a ’trash’ hurts a man of your stature so much, I must say you are really weak as a writer and can’t handle criticism. We do not need the ’good words’ of ’great saints’ to be retold here and what readers would like to see is some relevant and original write ups. If one is truly interested in such ’priceless gems’ one can always go ahead and buy the original books. Seeking followers for yourself by private messaging people and pleading them to comment (which would mean starring and nodding heads to every word you copy from others)is not only childish, but also annoying. I have nothing against you or your articles but what you write are not articles!
Take the example of this article on this very page which has generated hundreds of comments. 2 statements and 3 questions. With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly. I restrained myself from commenting on your articles for I found them not only annoying but plain TRASH.
Hope you write sensible articles which present original ’good words’ and help us understand why we should choose your path to reach ’HIM’ by reading plagiarized content and ramblings.
Take the example of this article on this very page which has generated hundreds of comments. 2 statements and 3 questions. With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly. I restrained myself from commenting on your articles for I found them not only annoying but plain TRASH.
Hope you write sensible articles which present original ’good words’ and help us understand why we should choose your path to reach ’HIM’ by reading plagiarized content and ramblings.
5 Stars
*If getting stars does good to your self esteem and a ’trash’ hurts a man of your stature so much, I must say you are really weak as a writer and can’t handle criticism.*
*With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly.*
If only I could star this comment over and over and over...and over again, I know I would reach a place more beautiful than Heaven. But I can’t so I shall close my eyes, because a WISE and ENLIGHTENED man recently told me ”True beauty 1000000 times more beautiful than Heaven can be viewed with closed eyes.”
*With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly.*
If only I could star this comment over and over and over...and over again, I know I would reach a place more beautiful than Heaven. But I can’t so I shall close my eyes, because a WISE and ENLIGHTENED man recently told me ”True beauty 1000000 times more beautiful than Heaven can be viewed with closed eyes.”
3 Stars
Bravo Jaiyant! U have penned all the words what I wanted to say! I don’t want Instablogs to become a platform for plagiarised and pseudo secular articles, reeking with essence of spirituality. Everybody should have the freedom of choice, and for someone who proclaims to be way above us, the ignorant and the ’fallen’ lot, this mere trashing of an article should not have affected him so much..what say??
2 Stars
Wishing You all the Best with Thanks for your kind time and effort to write your comments!!!
3 Stars
Hello Ratan,
I have just found this article and would like to comment on it. The idea of any contibutor having the right to trash an article is ridiculous. It’s like a reader deciding what goes into Times of India online or any other news outlet.
It would never occur to me to trash anyone’s work, whether I agree with it or not. A lot of people work hard to keep this site online, and it’s sheer arrogance to imagine that one can decide, just because it suits them, to trash whatever they feel like.
On the other hand, maybe the ”trash?” button should forward the story to an editor, who decides. AND IF PEOPLE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE EDITORIAL LINE OF IB, THEY ARE FREE TO GO ELSEWHERE! Since when did people decide to control the expression of others? Answer; since dictatorships exist.
Trashing is not democratic, it’s anarchic censorship.......and that’s precisely why editors exist, to counter it.
Thanks for reading
I have just found this article and would like to comment on it. The idea of any contibutor having the right to trash an article is ridiculous. It’s like a reader deciding what goes into Times of India online or any other news outlet.
It would never occur to me to trash anyone’s work, whether I agree with it or not. A lot of people work hard to keep this site online, and it’s sheer arrogance to imagine that one can decide, just because it suits them, to trash whatever they feel like.
On the other hand, maybe the ”trash?” button should forward the story to an editor, who decides. AND IF PEOPLE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE EDITORIAL LINE OF IB, THEY ARE FREE TO GO ELSEWHERE! Since when did people decide to control the expression of others? Answer; since dictatorships exist.
Trashing is not democratic, it’s anarchic censorship.......and that’s precisely why editors exist, to counter it.
Thanks for reading
2 Stars
”maybe the ’trash’ button should forward the story to an editor, who decides.”
It’s a good idea.
:)
It’s a good idea.
:)
1 Stars
@ Michael C
Even the editor’s consent to trash the article should be accomapined by proper reasons .What if the dictatorship of crooked minds on Instablogs gets replaced by the dictatorship of editor ? Either limit the intervention of editor or come to frame the panel of reputed and sensible members to decide the fate of controversial article.Then the decision of the panel to trash the article,being accompained by proper reasons,should be put to vote.If the majority comes to ratify the decision of the panel members with proper reason only then the green signal to trash the article be given .
Even the editor’s consent to trash the article should be accomapined by proper reasons .What if the dictatorship of crooked minds on Instablogs gets replaced by the dictatorship of editor ? Either limit the intervention of editor or come to frame the panel of reputed and sensible members to decide the fate of controversial article.Then the decision of the panel to trash the article,being accompained by proper reasons,should be put to vote.If the majority comes to ratify the decision of the panel members with proper reason only then the green signal to trash the article be given .
2 Stars
This word ’trash’ is harsh enough to tell you that your ’thoughts or views’ are deleted.
But I guess, DIGG was clever enough to use ’bury’ instead of ’trashing someone’s opinion’. It is better if someone objects its presence by burying it.
So MANY synonyms to a better effect than to ’trash’, for example: entomb, inhume, etc...
There should be an ultimate delete also, just the rights should be the same voice from the originator of the opinion.
But I guess, DIGG was clever enough to use ’bury’ instead of ’trashing someone’s opinion’. It is better if someone objects its presence by burying it.
So MANY synonyms to a better effect than to ’trash’, for example: entomb, inhume, etc...
There should be an ultimate delete also, just the rights should be the same voice from the originator of the opinion.
2 Stars
@ Arvind
Thank you for your reply. I couldn’t agree more with your concerns concerning the control of what is published and what is not on an internet site. They are legitimate.
But, if I may say so, we do live (or want to, in any case) in a society where free expression is allowed. This means that people also have the right to put up web sites which reflect their general thinking.
Fascists put up their sites. So What? Liberals and socialists too. Jews and muslims as well. THAT’S NORMAL. If you don’t like them, don’t go there!!
What is not normal, on the other hand, is a free-for-all where everyone wants to control the orientation of an internet site.
If someone wants to control what’s put up on a site, GREAT! ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS PUT UP A SITE OF THEIR OWN!! Bandwagon jumpers are everywhere. Not concerned enough to contribute, they behave like spoilt children. They break the toys. Too lazy to do the work, and too bourgois to have real convictions.
LET’S GET REAL HERE!!!!....
Thank you for your reply. I couldn’t agree more with your concerns concerning the control of what is published and what is not on an internet site. They are legitimate.
But, if I may say so, we do live (or want to, in any case) in a society where free expression is allowed. This means that people also have the right to put up web sites which reflect their general thinking.
Fascists put up their sites. So What? Liberals and socialists too. Jews and muslims as well. THAT’S NORMAL. If you don’t like them, don’t go there!!
What is not normal, on the other hand, is a free-for-all where everyone wants to control the orientation of an internet site.
If someone wants to control what’s put up on a site, GREAT! ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS PUT UP A SITE OF THEIR OWN!! Bandwagon jumpers are everywhere. Not concerned enough to contribute, they behave like spoilt children. They break the toys. Too lazy to do the work, and too bourgois to have real convictions.
LET’S GET REAL HERE!!!!....
2 Stars
@ Michael C ,
THE LONG AND SHORT OF TRASHING
I think there are some missing links . I have been on Instablogs for quite a long time now .I have come to realize that there is subtle attempts on the part of some denizens on Istablogs to clip the wings of some writers for the reasons best known to them .Like U.S. they are acting as a watchdog and like U.S. demolishing anyone who is not with them.They have adopted a certain pattern .Plant dubious stories about the person , spread bull-shit lies and if that’s not possible kill the very spirit of the writer via personal attacks enveloped in malicious intent.Instablogs ,of late ,has become idle platform for such distorted , crooked and derailed mindsets.
Cant’ they follow the simple rule that it’s best to ignore the piece if it dosen’t fit within your set of convictions.But that does not happpen. Some people start acting as ”Messiah ” even as they get exposed in an attempt to correct others.They are ready with their dos and don’ts ,fabrications of worse types and twisted logic.It’s not an attempt to silence these wicked people because that’s the very nature of world -to have all type of people . I am merely trying to create room for people who want to say something but are unable to do amid negative currents.
I have come across number of articles on Instablogs discussing size of penis , boobs etc. which for any sensible reader is shocking and appalling and devoid of any clinical purpose .I could have gone in for trash button but I didn’t do . Because it’s quite possible that such article are serving as a life-line for many on Instablogs who either want attention or seek pleausure .So whom am I to deny their quota of pleasure?Though my belief pattern has no place for these articles but this might not be the case with others.For them reading and endorsing such bogus article could be the top priority !!
In my eyes only those articles which are written to destroy the personna of writers , which are written with malicious intent aimed at defaming the writer and articles full of lies ,abuses and distotred facts are fit enough to be trashed but not without proper explanation and strict scrutiny .Let’s not downplay the image of anybody who is trying to resurrect certain values and beliefs with a right mindset. If you can’t digest such articles or for that mattter can’t come to terms with his/her popularity then please get away from his way instead of entering in personal vendetta with set of lies and prejudiced views .It’s my personal request not to turn Instablogs into a medium for settling personal scores . And if you are still intersted in locking bhorns please do it on merit and not via corrupt means .
THE LONG AND SHORT OF TRASHING
I think there are some missing links . I have been on Instablogs for quite a long time now .I have come to realize that there is subtle attempts on the part of some denizens on Istablogs to clip the wings of some writers for the reasons best known to them .Like U.S. they are acting as a watchdog and like U.S. demolishing anyone who is not with them.They have adopted a certain pattern .Plant dubious stories about the person , spread bull-shit lies and if that’s not possible kill the very spirit of the writer via personal attacks enveloped in malicious intent.Instablogs ,of late ,has become idle platform for such distorted , crooked and derailed mindsets.
Cant’ they follow the simple rule that it’s best to ignore the piece if it dosen’t fit within your set of convictions.But that does not happpen. Some people start acting as ”Messiah ” even as they get exposed in an attempt to correct others.They are ready with their dos and don’ts ,fabrications of worse types and twisted logic.It’s not an attempt to silence these wicked people because that’s the very nature of world -to have all type of people . I am merely trying to create room for people who want to say something but are unable to do amid negative currents.
I have come across number of articles on Instablogs discussing size of penis , boobs etc. which for any sensible reader is shocking and appalling and devoid of any clinical purpose .I could have gone in for trash button but I didn’t do . Because it’s quite possible that such article are serving as a life-line for many on Instablogs who either want attention or seek pleausure .So whom am I to deny their quota of pleasure?Though my belief pattern has no place for these articles but this might not be the case with others.For them reading and endorsing such bogus article could be the top priority !!
In my eyes only those articles which are written to destroy the personna of writers , which are written with malicious intent aimed at defaming the writer and articles full of lies ,abuses and distotred facts are fit enough to be trashed but not without proper explanation and strict scrutiny .Let’s not downplay the image of anybody who is trying to resurrect certain values and beliefs with a right mindset. If you can’t digest such articles or for that mattter can’t come to terms with his/her popularity then please get away from his way instead of entering in personal vendetta with set of lies and prejudiced views .It’s my personal request not to turn Instablogs into a medium for settling personal scores . And if you are still intersted in locking bhorns please do it on merit and not via corrupt means .
1 Stars
Now if any of your articles gets trashed please post that here.
Global Opinions (105)
8 Stars
I too agree with Dr. Saini. Members should share their views and comments instead of simply dump the article
4 Stars
Such a golden words written by Dr. Ratan are trashed by some one shows the mindset of people arround here.
How this community can grow and devlop as a leadeing blog space if we have such closed minded people?
How this community can grow and devlop as a leadeing blog space if we have such closed minded people?
7 Stars
The value of your articles is not in the criticsm of others but in the content of your subject. Kindly don’t get disheartened. You are a good writer. We appreciate your articles.
4 Stars
Even I have faced this...
It is unfair to trash articles in a forum like Instablogs where all are free to comment and choose what to read and what not to read.
It is unfair to trash articles in a forum like Instablogs where all are free to comment and choose what to read and what not to read.
5 Stars
That is enormous work .you are looking into some excellent thoughts which will do world of good for instablogs.I totally agree with your point ,when we are allowed to present our views then why TRASH ?
4 Stars
This is not a good sign for a good community which wants to grow and do some thing for the society.
I deeply condemn such an act and would request the administrators of the blog to remove such an option of trashing any article. Only the editors should have any such right that two they can propose to the chief editor and on approval of the same any article may be trashed.
What other members can do is, they should support this kind of procedure or arrangement to trash any article, as mentioned above.
I deeply condemn such an act and would request the administrators of the blog to remove such an option of trashing any article. Only the editors should have any such right that two they can propose to the chief editor and on approval of the same any article may be trashed.
What other members can do is, they should support this kind of procedure or arrangement to trash any article, as mentioned above.
4 Stars
I also agree to such an administrative option for trashing any article popular or upcoming.
Only the Chief Editor should have a right to trash any article, prosed by members, star members or regional or super editors.
The concerned persons in management should look into this and implement the same at the earliest for the true growth of the Instablogs.
Only the Chief Editor should have a right to trash any article, prosed by members, star members or regional or super editors.
The concerned persons in management should look into this and implement the same at the earliest for the true growth of the Instablogs.
4 Stars
Looking forward to such an arrangement from Instablogs.
8 Stars
Hello Dr Ratan, although I completely agree with what you have said that Instablogs should be the platform for healthy debate, and people should have the freedom of choice to read or not to read an article, I want to humbly point out that if Instablogs becomes just a platform for articles with religious overtones and spiritual bent, it would loose its essence. Your articles are very thought provoking, deeply spiritual, and there can be thousands of people around the globe who swear by them. But they should not take the stance of preaching and enlightening the whole world. Then the conflict starts, and people have a tendency to dump them in the trash can. Infact, you personally had asked me to give my comments on some of your articles, but I preferred to keep quiet, as I do not agree with some of your views. As Madhuri has aptly said, its the freedom of choice!
4 Stars
If one is not agreeing with any article he can simply write his views and the reasons.
But to trash any article which is like by many is shear indiscipline on part of the person who is doing it and the management of the blog administrators.
If you write some good article and they are trashed by some one how you feel about it?
But to trash any article which is like by many is shear indiscipline on part of the person who is doing it and the management of the blog administrators.
If you write some good article and they are trashed by some one how you feel about it?
9 Stars
I also remember trashing one of your articles yesterday. It was a poem on Saint Kabir.
The poem was good but has nothing to do with news.
I think we need groups on Instablogs, where people share stuff other than news.
Poems can`t be mixed with news and op-ed pieces.
The poem was good but has nothing to do with news.
I think we need groups on Instablogs, where people share stuff other than news.
Poems can`t be mixed with news and op-ed pieces.
6 Stars
An Article is not required to be news, if I understand instablogs policy.
4 Stars
This is too bad on part of fello members to delet popular artilces like this and admin should look into the problem so that such thing do not repeat any time in future.
5 Stars
I dont get it. Why would someone do this? I mean can you stop people from thinking something? And if we cant then whats the point of stopping them from expressing?
I dont know what instablogs policy is but if this is how people are gonna react, i will be trashed out of this community soon... lol
I dont know what instablogs policy is but if this is how people are gonna react, i will be trashed out of this community soon... lol
5 Stars
Very true, there will be no good writers and readers on this blog space if this contnues like this.
5 Stars
I am waiting for a response from Instablogs about a concrete reply and will surely follow your suggestion.
4 Stars
I think such a community can not progress who wants to close the eyes and want take away the pen from noble writers.
Alas !!! Where we are heading to ?
.......
A coward society which do not want to read the truth.
Alas !!! Where we are heading to ?
.......
A coward society which do not want to read the truth.
6 Stars
True!!!
I was told we cud express here whatever we wanted. But if this forum is meant for the news of ”politics” alone, then adieu from my side, as to me politics is the shallowest thing on earth!
Dr. Ratan is sharing beautiful things; its ugly to trash them. You dont agree, fine, but trashing implies trashing someone’s heart... heart is where God dwells...
”Bay shak Mandir, Masjid touro Bulle Shah ye Kehta
Pyar bhara dil na touro, is mein Eshwer rehta!”
Dr. Ratan, you have a heart full of love and know that I love u and am with you!!!
I was told we cud express here whatever we wanted. But if this forum is meant for the news of ”politics” alone, then adieu from my side, as to me politics is the shallowest thing on earth!
Dr. Ratan is sharing beautiful things; its ugly to trash them. You dont agree, fine, but trashing implies trashing someone’s heart... heart is where God dwells...
”Bay shak Mandir, Masjid touro Bulle Shah ye Kehta
Pyar bhara dil na touro, is mein Eshwer rehta!”
Dr. Ratan, you have a heart full of love and know that I love u and am with you!!!
8 Stars
I think everything is working perfect here at Instablogs. I read all articles of Dr. Saini, all are excellent pieces. However, what’s the point in just rewriting the “good words of Great Saints” here. If it’s related to the context of any story, it’s fine, but otherwise I don’t see any point in reposting all religious Almanacs of the world here. Be original!
5 Stars
Question is if Insatblog has no such prohibition on such postings then who has the right to tarsh the article liked by so mant including you?
6 Stars
Trashing someone’s articles is nothing but an act of cowardice. This act simply reflects the doer’s weak state of mind! It’s like damaging a painter’s painting, just because you yourself can’t paint!
Instablogs should simply ask the person trashing somone’s article to give an appropriate reason for doing so! and only if they are able to give any reasonable reason for doing so, should the article be trashed!
Instablogs should simply ask the person trashing somone’s article to give an appropriate reason for doing so! and only if they are able to give any reasonable reason for doing so, should the article be trashed!
5 Stars
Thats right !!
When Instablogs has open policy and allow any article to be posted and liked by members than what is the justification that which gives right of deleting an article.
If it is desired to control the quality of articles then let it be referred first to the editor and then on its approval it may be published. But once any one can freely anything then how one can delete the same without any valid rule or reason?
I request Instablog administration to please clarify this point and let everyone know the change, if any, in this policy of trashing?
When Instablogs has open policy and allow any article to be posted and liked by members than what is the justification that which gives right of deleting an article.
If it is desired to control the quality of articles then let it be referred first to the editor and then on its approval it may be published. But once any one can freely anything then how one can delete the same without any valid rule or reason?
I request Instablog administration to please clarify this point and let everyone know the change, if any, in this policy of trashing?
8 Stars
Naheeeeeeeee ye naheeee ho saktaaaaaaa
Azadi mere dulhan hai... oh sorry... azadi mera dulha hai...lol
Azadi mere dulhan hai... oh sorry... azadi mera dulha hai...lol
4 Stars
I agree to the comment of Dr. Ratan Saini above that a clear cut policy on trashing should be published by Insatblogs.
5 Stars
Yes, there should be no trashing on any article which is allowed to be submitted.
7 Stars
I think there should be a special section for articles out of news or poem or personal stories where users can simply send their views. Let them be published completely unedited, let them to raise their voice but no option for TRASH.
However, DELETE option is also necessary but in the rarest case, and that should be in the hands of chief editor.
Users can simply inform the editorial desk, if s/he finds anything objectionable.
So NO TRASH PLZ...
However, DELETE option is also necessary but in the rarest case, and that should be in the hands of chief editor.
Users can simply inform the editorial desk, if s/he finds anything objectionable.
So NO TRASH PLZ...
3 Stars
The Instablogs has agreed to do the needful and have informed to me that there will be strict control on the article trashing possibility.
4 Stars
I am against Chief Editor.
People should decide what is good or what is bad.
I don`t want Instablogs to be a voice of a single guy (read Chief Editor).
Infact Instablogs doesn’t have a voice of its own. We let people be our voice.
People should decide what is good or what is bad.
I don`t want Instablogs to be a voice of a single guy (read Chief Editor).
Infact Instablogs doesn’t have a voice of its own. We let people be our voice.
7 Stars
WOW.
although I am new to blogging and to INSTABLOGS, I must live in a cave. I didn’t even know it was possible to trash an article, and knowing it is now, I can’t fathom the idea. I will not lie and say I am an avid reader of Dr. Ratan’s work, but after seeing his post, I had to investigate the commotion. Whether the few readers responsible for the destruction of his work would like to admit it or even feel the same way, Dr. Ratan’s work is obviously, due to his stars and comments ON EVERY ARTICLE, doing something right in MANY readers eyes. It seems rather ”almighty”, in my humble eyes to take that gift from someone else simply because one chose to think it was ”inappropiatly” categorized. Do the same people rip out pages of novels, encyclopedias, and other texts they have no intrest for? Are they the ones that rip out pages of magazines left for ALL patients to read in the doctor’s office? I had no idea as a general rule for blogs and otherwise we were FORCED to read each and every article..(I’ve got my work cut out for me). Haven’t they ever heard of Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder or how about this one: ONE MANS TRASH IS ANOTHER MANS TREASURE?
although I am new to blogging and to INSTABLOGS, I must live in a cave. I didn’t even know it was possible to trash an article, and knowing it is now, I can’t fathom the idea. I will not lie and say I am an avid reader of Dr. Ratan’s work, but after seeing his post, I had to investigate the commotion. Whether the few readers responsible for the destruction of his work would like to admit it or even feel the same way, Dr. Ratan’s work is obviously, due to his stars and comments ON EVERY ARTICLE, doing something right in MANY readers eyes. It seems rather ”almighty”, in my humble eyes to take that gift from someone else simply because one chose to think it was ”inappropiatly” categorized. Do the same people rip out pages of novels, encyclopedias, and other texts they have no intrest for? Are they the ones that rip out pages of magazines left for ALL patients to read in the doctor’s office? I had no idea as a general rule for blogs and otherwise we were FORCED to read each and every article..(I’ve got my work cut out for me). Haven’t they ever heard of Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder or how about this one: ONE MANS TRASH IS ANOTHER MANS TREASURE?
3 Stars
This is called negative and destructive approach to life and people with this approach will never be able to enjoy the fruits of true happiness.
4 Stars
I always wondered what the trash button meant. I assumed, though have never used, that it was just to remove it from an individuals home page.
and as Oscar says, if you aren’t interested just don’t read.
and as Oscar says, if you aren’t interested just don’t read.
4 Stars
That is the right way. I my self don’t read so many articles which talk about funny things which has no relevance for me.
5 Stars
What about all good words about freedom of expression. Dr. Saini’s articles are posted in the lifestyle channel and I believe that poems written by great people affects our lives. There is more in our lifestyle than only latest fashion trends.
4 Stars
I find there are people like you here who knows the right answer to the problem and understand the views of a writer.
13 Stars
Dr. Saini,
You are very good in playing to the gallery, aren't you? You have all the freedom to publish your stories without being trashed. I gather that stories are buried when a certain number of users 'trash' it. It is not possible for only one member to trash a story and bury it as it seems to have happened with some of your posts.
It is the community that makes your post reach the popular section of the homepage and it is the community that removes it from there. The power is with the community and not with the individual. So you might find some of your stories being made popular only to find their way in the trash can the next moment.
The irony is that only popular stories become conspicuous (by reaching the popular section of the homepage), and only conspicuous stories are trashed!
So what you feel about your stories are not exactly what the reality is. Contrary to being popular, your stories actually proved to be unpopular and hence, trashed.
Hope you will feel a lot better now.
You are very good in playing to the gallery, aren't you? You have all the freedom to publish your stories without being trashed. I gather that stories are buried when a certain number of users 'trash' it. It is not possible for only one member to trash a story and bury it as it seems to have happened with some of your posts.
It is the community that makes your post reach the popular section of the homepage and it is the community that removes it from there. The power is with the community and not with the individual. So you might find some of your stories being made popular only to find their way in the trash can the next moment.
The irony is that only popular stories become conspicuous (by reaching the popular section of the homepage), and only conspicuous stories are trashed!
So what you feel about your stories are not exactly what the reality is. Contrary to being popular, your stories actually proved to be unpopular and hence, trashed.
Hope you will feel a lot better now.
4 Stars
If story is not popular it remain in upcoming for a given span of time say seven days and after that it is removed automatically.
10 Stars
Hello Dr. Saini,
If you pay attention, you will see three more buttons besides the ’Trash’ button. Now, I would like to say just one thing - if you are prepared to celebrate the first three buttons, then you should also be strong enough to accept the importance of the fourth button ie. the ’Trash’ button.
Its got to do with freedom of choice and any intelligent person like you should know that ’your treasure is not always treasure for others’..and whats not treasure is TRASH.
Personally I feel you should try to nail a good publishing house and make a paperback of your poems, both original and lifted. And yeah, be well aware about the copyright issue.
BTW, I’m going to exercise my right to hit one of the four buttons at the top right corner of this post. Any guesses Dr. Saini, about the button I’m gonna hit?
If you pay attention, you will see three more buttons besides the ’Trash’ button. Now, I would like to say just one thing - if you are prepared to celebrate the first three buttons, then you should also be strong enough to accept the importance of the fourth button ie. the ’Trash’ button.
Its got to do with freedom of choice and any intelligent person like you should know that ’your treasure is not always treasure for others’..and whats not treasure is TRASH.
Personally I feel you should try to nail a good publishing house and make a paperback of your poems, both original and lifted. And yeah, be well aware about the copyright issue.
BTW, I’m going to exercise my right to hit one of the four buttons at the top right corner of this post. Any guesses Dr. Saini, about the button I’m gonna hit?
4 Stars
I have given very clear logic about why trash should not be allowed. Face the world instead of closing your eyes.
7 Stars
Trash feature is important and it should remain there. What if someone posted illegal, rumor, hatred, pornographic material?
This feature helps users to keep Instablogs safe, clean and up to date.
Trash votes helps users in moderating the homepage. Again I repeating it takes more than one trash votes to remove article from the homepage.
If your article is trashed, it means multiple people have voted against you.
This feature helps users to keep Instablogs safe, clean and up to date.
Trash votes helps users in moderating the homepage. Again I repeating it takes more than one trash votes to remove article from the homepage.
If your article is trashed, it means multiple people have voted against you.
6 Stars
Completely agree with you and Nandini. Infact I can’t fathom why an emancipated soul like Dr Ratan will be influenced and hurt by such petty things as to who has trashed his articles? I thought he’s way above all these petty things...LOL:p!!!
6 Stars
Wah Bhai!
Ratan, you are essentially trying to say that "if you like my story comment and star it and if you don't like my story just say why you didn't like/ignore/go away".
Why sir?
If you love the bouquets so much you must also learn to receive brickbats. How many of your stories are being trashed as opposed not to have been trashed? I think only about 2-3?
Ratan, you are essentially trying to say that "if you like my story comment and star it and if you don't like my story just say why you didn't like/ignore/go away".
Why sir?
If you love the bouquets so much you must also learn to receive brickbats. How many of your stories are being trashed as opposed not to have been trashed? I think only about 2-3?
4 Stars
One should write their views opposing what is written in a proper way. If the article is not there what and where are the brickbats going to strike?
6 Stars
If an article is trashed, it is not deleted. It is only removed from the homepage. It remains in your MyBlog.
And it takes more than one vote to get your article trashed. Just like it takes more than one vote to get any article popular.
And it takes more than one vote to get your article trashed. Just like it takes more than one vote to get any article popular.
5 Stars
The TRASH feature is meant to serve a good purpose. But it is also used for other purposes, like “doing away” with an article the “trasher” doesn’t like or “suppressing” the views of a writer whom one doesn’t like, etc.
It should be made mandatory for the “trasher” to give two reasons for his/her action and these reasons should be made public along with the identity of the “trasher” on the article page. This may bring down instances of unnecessary “trashing”.
One of my articles also was “trashed’ by some one. But when I contacted the Instablogs Team, they found the article good, “untrashed” it and moved it to the Home page. You can read it here: Will the Communists support the Congress-led government if Manmohan Singh is replaced?
It is clear that some well laid rules are needed in this connection.
Instablogs may make a separate section available for philosophical deliberations, poems, religious discourses, etc. as Deepak has suggested. And as he has said, the “TRASH” option should be in the hands of the chief editor, who may act on receiving a certain number of “TRASH requests” from Community members.
It should be made mandatory for the “trasher” to give two reasons for his/her action and these reasons should be made public along with the identity of the “trasher” on the article page. This may bring down instances of unnecessary “trashing”.
One of my articles also was “trashed’ by some one. But when I contacted the Instablogs Team, they found the article good, “untrashed” it and moved it to the Home page. You can read it here: Will the Communists support the Congress-led government if Manmohan Singh is replaced?
It is clear that some well laid rules are needed in this connection.
Instablogs may make a separate section available for philosophical deliberations, poems, religious discourses, etc. as Deepak has suggested. And as he has said, the “TRASH” option should be in the hands of the chief editor, who may act on receiving a certain number of “TRASH requests” from Community members.
4 Stars
Your views provide clear indication of what should be the system.
7 Stars
Instablogs doesn`t have Chief Editor. Please leave editorial tyranny for traditional media only.
Here’s all members are equal. They can be writers, editors or moderators.
”TRASH” option is in and will remain in hand of members.
Here’s all members are equal. They can be writers, editors or moderators.
”TRASH” option is in and will remain in hand of members.
4 Stars
It may be seen here as how people behave in so different ways. Forgetting the true sense of right and wrong.
8 Stars
An article can be trashed by any registered member. Once it receives enough ”trash votes” it moves away from the homepage.
This is same way how an article get popular and moves to homepage.
There is no Editorial control over it. But if you are a popular writer like Dr. Saini, who is a Super Editor, then his articles needs more than few trashes to get removed.
Democracy has negative shades as well.
*But look on the other hand 44 comments, you have got a great community build around your opinions.
This is same way how an article get popular and moves to homepage.
There is no Editorial control over it. But if you are a popular writer like Dr. Saini, who is a Super Editor, then his articles needs more than few trashes to get removed.
Democracy has negative shades as well.
*But look on the other hand 44 comments, you have got a great community build around your opinions.
5 Stars
Dear Nandini,
My article which was “trashed” (pl. see my Comment above) was trashed within less than 10 minutes of posting it on Instablogs, and when the article was still in the Upcoming section.
It was easy to understand it had been “trashed” by a person who had been infuriated by my Comments (and those of some other well informed members) in the ongoing discussion on an article at that time (the number of Comments had crossed a hundred). The inability to take part in a discussion with an unbiased and objective mindset led the person to “trash” my news based article that was in no way unfit for publication.
I don’t think 14 members had read that article within 10 minutes and all the 14 found it unfit or objectionable. I think, it is possible for any one member to “trash” an article, clicking the mouse sufficient number of times.
Democracy doesn’t permit one person to hurt another, or empower one person to prevent another from expressing his/her views. The suggestions made here, by a number of members, to introduce some regulations about the use of the TRASH feature are valid and they deserve consideration. ”Regulations” are the very foundation of ”civilization” and they need not be seen as a form of ”tyranny”.
:)
My article which was “trashed” (pl. see my Comment above) was trashed within less than 10 minutes of posting it on Instablogs, and when the article was still in the Upcoming section.
It was easy to understand it had been “trashed” by a person who had been infuriated by my Comments (and those of some other well informed members) in the ongoing discussion on an article at that time (the number of Comments had crossed a hundred). The inability to take part in a discussion with an unbiased and objective mindset led the person to “trash” my news based article that was in no way unfit for publication.
I don’t think 14 members had read that article within 10 minutes and all the 14 found it unfit or objectionable. I think, it is possible for any one member to “trash” an article, clicking the mouse sufficient number of times.
Democracy doesn’t permit one person to hurt another, or empower one person to prevent another from expressing his/her views. The suggestions made here, by a number of members, to introduce some regulations about the use of the TRASH feature are valid and they deserve consideration. ”Regulations” are the very foundation of ”civilization” and they need not be seen as a form of ”tyranny”.
:)
4 Stars
@ Paulraj
I am happy to read your explanation of the reality one experiences. But there are people in this world who can not read the truth and want to delete it.
Thanks for taking time off to write on my article.
I am happy to read your explanation of the reality one experiences. But there are people in this world who can not read the truth and want to delete it.
Thanks for taking time off to write on my article.
5 Stars
Thank you Dr. Ratan!
What needs to be said, must be said.
What needs to be said, must be said.
3 Stars
@ R.M.Paulraj
One member can trash a story only once, just like one member is allowed only one vote/star per story.
Democracy has some benefits and some pitfalls as well.
Just tell me a better solution than to let our readers moderate the stories. We don`t want team of editors to police stories submitted. Not all stories deserve to be on homepage.
So there are two options, hire a team of editors to star or trash stories or let users do it.
Please tell me which is better one?
One member can trash a story only once, just like one member is allowed only one vote/star per story.
Democracy has some benefits and some pitfalls as well.
Just tell me a better solution than to let our readers moderate the stories. We don`t want team of editors to police stories submitted. Not all stories deserve to be on homepage.
So there are two options, hire a team of editors to star or trash stories or let users do it.
Please tell me which is better one?
3 Stars
Some regulatory mechanism is needed for sure, and there are acceptable suggestions for the same in the Comments here.
If a member can ”trash” a story only once how does a story get ”trashed” in about ten minutes? Even the most popular writer on Instablogs is not read by that many readers within such a short time. (Should I believe that 14 members were waiting ready with their fingers on the left click button of their mouse to ”trash” that article so fast? 14 is the number of clicks needed to ”trash” an article, I am told.)
If a member can ”trash” a story only once how does a story get ”trashed” in about ten minutes? Even the most popular writer on Instablogs is not read by that many readers within such a short time. (Should I believe that 14 members were waiting ready with their fingers on the left click button of their mouse to ”trash” that article so fast? 14 is the number of clicks needed to ”trash” an article, I am told.)
6 Stars
It appears that there are quite a few people here on Insta who are opinionated way beyond what is permissible on Insta, or anywhere else for that matter. Advice, unasked for, is being forced down our throats till we are bloated with someone else’s views of life and the beyond. Individual views are often disrespected to the extent that we are deemed imbeciles, merely for disagreeing with another.
There are those of us who believe and those of us who don’t, and then there are the curious on either side of the fence.
I find my life not really worth living when I have to live it as someone else judges right..
There are those of us who believe and those of us who don’t, and then there are the curious on either side of the fence.
I find my life not really worth living when I have to live it as someone else judges right..
7 Stars
Jayashree,
Nobody is judging you on Instablogs.
You write an article - it goes to your ”MyBlog”.
Once it receives enough popular votes, it moves to homepage.
On the other hand, if it receives enough ”Trash votes”, it moves away from homepage.
But it always remain in your MyBlog.
Your friends, fans etc can always read your opinions in your ”MyBlog”.
Nobody is judging you on Instablogs.
You write an article - it goes to your ”MyBlog”.
Once it receives enough popular votes, it moves to homepage.
On the other hand, if it receives enough ”Trash votes”, it moves away from homepage.
But it always remain in your MyBlog.
Your friends, fans etc can always read your opinions in your ”MyBlog”.
6 Stars
@Nandini Thanks for letting me know that!
I understood from an earlier comment that when an article receives enough ’trash’ votes it is ’deleted’. I mean, I MISunderstood.
I understood from an earlier comment that when an article receives enough ’trash’ votes it is ’deleted’. I mean, I MISunderstood.
4 Stars
When the article is trashed no body can change or add anything in it and it is covered with a white film as something obscene. It will hurt you if you ever see that on your blog page.
6 Stars
It would certainly hurt me, Dr. Ratan. No doubt about it.
4 Stars
I can imagine the state of mind when one has to undergo such a situation.
5 Stars
I hope the necessary steps will be taken by Insatblog to avoid such a situation for anyone.
3 Stars
This white film will only come if you yourself has trash it.
If I trash a story, only I will see the white film on that story and nobody else or those who have trash the story.
I recommend a feature of untrashing a story also.
If I trash a story, only I will see the white film on that story and nobody else or those who have trash the story.
I recommend a feature of untrashing a story also.
4 Stars
Hi Nandini,
You are very much right that there shouldn’t be any specific editorial control in Instablogs taking its nature of citizen’s voice. But then there should be some kind of governance as they are doing....
One suggestion that I can view very much suitable is the TRASH option should only be limited to very specific users taking their history into count, who not only submit stories but also writes on a regular basis.
Because, if it is for all then for instance a group of people (like me and my friends) can eliminate a story without any cause; just due to the fact that they don’t want that particular story.
You are very much right that there shouldn’t be any specific editorial control in Instablogs taking its nature of citizen’s voice. But then there should be some kind of governance as they are doing....
One suggestion that I can view very much suitable is the TRASH option should only be limited to very specific users taking their history into count, who not only submit stories but also writes on a regular basis.
Because, if it is for all then for instance a group of people (like me and my friends) can eliminate a story without any cause; just due to the fact that they don’t want that particular story.
4 Stars
Why people break heart of others ? What kind of pleasure they enjoy in this cruel act of theirs?
May GOD bless them with proper and true sense.
May GOD bless them with proper and true sense.
2 Stars
@ Nandini
If I did that trash then I will never ask any one as Who Trashed it ?
If I did that trash then I will never ask any one as Who Trashed it ?
2 Stars
What is this? Will any one ever ”trash” his/her own story? It is always possible to edit or completely rewrite the story.
The transparent film cover (or, what to call it?) appears on the article page when it is trashed. I saw it on my article when it had been trashed by some one.
The transparent film cover (or, what to call it?) appears on the article page when it is trashed. I saw it on my article when it had been trashed by some one.
4 Stars
I am saying it could be a mistake.
As I have told you only one trash vote can`t remove a story. It needs multiple trash votes, and whenever somebody trashes a story/comments it disappears for them, only for them.
And as I can see, you are one of the Top Members on Instablogs, your stories to be trashed needs more negative votes than usual member stories.
As I have told you only one trash vote can`t remove a story. It needs multiple trash votes, and whenever somebody trashes a story/comments it disappears for them, only for them.
And as I can see, you are one of the Top Members on Instablogs, your stories to be trashed needs more negative votes than usual member stories.
7 Stars
Ratan's profile reads:
If you practice what you say then why the hell you are complaining so much? Think of it as God's own wish that some members trashed your posts.
:-D
BE HAPPY with what ever you have been granted by HIM!!!
If you practice what you say then why the hell you are complaining so much? Think of it as God's own wish that some members trashed your posts.
:-D
3 Stars
I am no doubt happy with what ever I am getting from people like you and HIM. The point is Instablogs should know how the community should behave.
1 Stars
Dear Dr. Ratan Saini ,
” Everyone has a viewpoint ” - the motto of Instablogs says all .The trash button goes against the very spirit of Instablogs .If you don’t like the article then simply ignore it .What’s the point in wasting time over it ?
If that’s not possible then form a panel of reputed members to decide whether an item is to be trashed or not . But even this very right should be used in the rarest of rare case .
It’s quite possible that some people ,in league with their vested interests , decide to use the trash button . In other words , the trash button can be misused by the wrong people .
” Everyone has a viewpoint ” - the motto of Instablogs says all .The trash button goes against the very spirit of Instablogs .If you don’t like the article then simply ignore it .What’s the point in wasting time over it ?
If that’s not possible then form a panel of reputed members to decide whether an item is to be trashed or not . But even this very right should be used in the rarest of rare case .
It’s quite possible that some people ,in league with their vested interests , decide to use the trash button . In other words , the trash button can be misused by the wrong people .
4 Stars
My view is face the world because its not your own article which you want to trash.
5 Stars
@Saini -
Dude, this translucent white film that veils a trashed post is called purdah.
Did you hear the song -
Purdah Hai Purdah, Purdeh Ke Pichhe, Purdah Nashin Hai
Purdah Nashin Ko Be-Purdah Na Kar Dun To
Elias Mera Nam Nahin Hai
Purdah Hai Purdah...
Click on the video to play it.
Cheers!
When the article is trashed no body can change or add anything in it and it is covered with a white film as something obscene.
Dude, this translucent white film that veils a trashed post is called purdah.
Did you hear the song -
Purdah Hai Purdah, Purdeh Ke Pichhe, Purdah Nashin Hai
Purdah Nashin Ko Be-Purdah Na Kar Dun To
Elias Mera Nam Nahin Hai
Purdah Hai Purdah...
Click on the video to play it.
Cheers!
3 Stars
I understand what you want to communicate.
But its public property one may not like to see but let others see and comment on.
But its public property one may not like to see but let others see and comment on.
6 Stars
Hi Arvind Illahabaadi -
So nice to see you back after a long time. I thought you spent the time studying Wren and Martin on how to punctuate properly because I sincerely believe (and sympathize with you) that you had to drop out of kindergarten. Unfortunately, you have not heeded my advice.
So nice to see you back after a long time. I thought you spent the time studying Wren and Martin on how to punctuate properly because I sincerely believe (and sympathize with you) that you had to drop out of kindergarten. Unfortunately, you have not heeded my advice.
4 Stars
I a happy to see old friends interacting through this article.
6 Stars
If what Nandini says is true then I am fine with it. Yes Jayashree, it seems that some people here are too opinionated, but that is the nature of the game.
5 Stars
like they say one man’s medicine could be another’s poison...opinions are thus!
as long as you don’t hurt sentiments unnecessarily i dont think democracy should have problem
as long as you don’t hurt sentiments unnecessarily i dont think democracy should have problem
3 Stars
If a person has true values and act accordingly the system can be good foe everyone except those who are behaving other way round.
6 Stars
Hey Dr. please check the uploaded image. And read the description to know my logic about why the trash option should be kept intact at Instablogs.
It all sums up to just one thing - if someone doesn’t find anything useful, he has every right to dispose it off in the garbage. Your articles are no exception!
It all sums up to just one thing - if someone doesn’t find anything useful, he has every right to dispose it off in the garbage. Your articles are no exception!
4 Stars
If you are the owner then only you can destroy but if it is in public domain and you destroy or kill then it is treated as murder and one has to face the punishments for it.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
4 Stars
Well..I still do not know how instablogs function and whether the editor or chief editor is qualified. Editor’s job is to edit but it does not mean he or she has to edit everything that is submitted. Once it happened to me that the work i posted got rejected even before it is queued. I tried twice. it seemed they just dont want it there. I sent it to my editor colleagues and what they said is somebody like editing very much and nothing wrong in the post. And one must see all kinda news given in the newsroom.Can’t they get decent ones? Most of them are ### rated. I honestly feel that instablogs is biased. When I asked them about this, they just kept mum.Now i feel so disheartened that I dont feel like posting anything. feels like my wings are broken:(
4 Stars
Well I have a practical suggection, please save a copy of your posts and try re-submitting. If gets ’trashed’ again. Put up the post on any other cj web-sites. I did that once. The one that was trashed here in minutes became ’picks’ of the day at the other web-site on the same day.
The ’trashed’ article can be re-cyled.
It does hurt when people reject but ’trash’ seems to be part of the blogging game here. Also all well-known writers have had to accept rejection slips in the beginning of their writing career.
The ’trashed’ article can be re-cyled.
It does hurt when people reject but ’trash’ seems to be part of the blogging game here. Also all well-known writers have had to accept rejection slips in the beginning of their writing career.
4 Stars
Trashing someone’s article is a clear indication that you can’t tolerate one’s view. It’s a sort of jealousy and hatred. I don’t know why people trash articles if they have every right and scope to present their views against of it. There should be a guard against this activity- who is trashing what.
2 Stars
There are people here in this community who can not read the truth.
I am writing these article for such people only.
The one Who can read the truth have already read it.
I am writing these article for such people only.
The one Who can read the truth have already read it.
4 Stars
I am in complete agreement with Dr. Saini. Almost no opinion is worth ’not being heard’. One may hear and ignore but not without hearing it. So, let everything be voiced and if it is indeed worth being trashed, it will eventually be subdued by saner voices.
2 Stars
I hope one day people of all types will be able to read the truth.
7 Stars
@ Dr. Ratan I’m Always Right Saini
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
And posting protest articles can not justify the importance of your Trash articles either!
Instead of crying hoarse over a rejection (by the mass), you should come up with good articles and prove your worth. It doesn’t suit a person of your caliber to engage the community members with your non-article (the current one).
If there is no check on such submissions (which include profane, useless, plagiarized, spam, or derogatory articles) very soon this platform will get stinking. And thats not a good idea, fail to woo me atleast.
Posting pictures can not justify any crime.
And posting protest articles can not justify the importance of your Trash articles either!
Instead of crying hoarse over a rejection (by the mass), you should come up with good articles and prove your worth. It doesn’t suit a person of your caliber to engage the community members with your non-article (the current one).
If there is no check on such submissions (which include profane, useless, plagiarized, spam, or derogatory articles) very soon this platform will get stinking. And thats not a good idea, fail to woo me atleast.
10 Stars
Dr. Ratan Saini, the self professed guru of Instablogs. You may have a huge fan following here thanks to your plagiarized material from almost all the religious books. Reminds me of the Pied Piper who led all the mice to the water body. Pied Piper however used original ideas. If getting stars does good to your self esteem and a ’trash’ hurts a man of your stature so much, I must say you are really weak as a writer and can’t handle criticism. We do not need the ’good words’ of ’great saints’ to be retold here and what readers would like to see is some relevant and original write ups. If one is truly interested in such ’priceless gems’ one can always go ahead and buy the original books. Seeking followers for yourself by private messaging people and pleading them to comment (which would mean starring and nodding heads to every word you copy from others)is not only childish, but also annoying. I have nothing against you or your articles but what you write are not articles!
Take the example of this article on this very page which has generated hundreds of comments. 2 statements and 3 questions. With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly. I restrained myself from commenting on your articles for I found them not only annoying but plain TRASH.
Hope you write sensible articles which present original ’good words’ and help us understand why we should choose your path to reach ’HIM’ by reading plagiarized content and ramblings.
Take the example of this article on this very page which has generated hundreds of comments. 2 statements and 3 questions. With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly. I restrained myself from commenting on your articles for I found them not only annoying but plain TRASH.
Hope you write sensible articles which present original ’good words’ and help us understand why we should choose your path to reach ’HIM’ by reading plagiarized content and ramblings.
5 Stars
*If getting stars does good to your self esteem and a ’trash’ hurts a man of your stature so much, I must say you are really weak as a writer and can’t handle criticism.*
*With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly.*
If only I could star this comment over and over and over...and over again, I know I would reach a place more beautiful than Heaven. But I can’t so I shall close my eyes, because a WISE and ENLIGHTENED man recently told me ”True beauty 1000000 times more beautiful than Heaven can be viewed with closed eyes.”
*With enough grammatical blunders to make anyone snigger. You even failed to spell the blog’s name correctly.*
If only I could star this comment over and over and over...and over again, I know I would reach a place more beautiful than Heaven. But I can’t so I shall close my eyes, because a WISE and ENLIGHTENED man recently told me ”True beauty 1000000 times more beautiful than Heaven can be viewed with closed eyes.”
3 Stars
Bravo Jaiyant! U have penned all the words what I wanted to say! I don’t want Instablogs to become a platform for plagiarised and pseudo secular articles, reeking with essence of spirituality. Everybody should have the freedom of choice, and for someone who proclaims to be way above us, the ignorant and the ’fallen’ lot, this mere trashing of an article should not have affected him so much..what say??
2 Stars
Wishing You all the Best with Thanks for your kind time and effort to write your comments!!!
3 Stars
Hello Ratan,
I have just found this article and would like to comment on it. The idea of any contibutor having the right to trash an article is ridiculous. It’s like a reader deciding what goes into Times of India online or any other news outlet.
It would never occur to me to trash anyone’s work, whether I agree with it or not. A lot of people work hard to keep this site online, and it’s sheer arrogance to imagine that one can decide, just because it suits them, to trash whatever they feel like.
On the other hand, maybe the ”trash?” button should forward the story to an editor, who decides. AND IF PEOPLE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE EDITORIAL LINE OF IB, THEY ARE FREE TO GO ELSEWHERE! Since when did people decide to control the expression of others? Answer; since dictatorships exist.
Trashing is not democratic, it’s anarchic censorship.......and that’s precisely why editors exist, to counter it.
Thanks for reading
I have just found this article and would like to comment on it. The idea of any contibutor having the right to trash an article is ridiculous. It’s like a reader deciding what goes into Times of India online or any other news outlet.
It would never occur to me to trash anyone’s work, whether I agree with it or not. A lot of people work hard to keep this site online, and it’s sheer arrogance to imagine that one can decide, just because it suits them, to trash whatever they feel like.
On the other hand, maybe the ”trash?” button should forward the story to an editor, who decides. AND IF PEOPLE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE EDITORIAL LINE OF IB, THEY ARE FREE TO GO ELSEWHERE! Since when did people decide to control the expression of others? Answer; since dictatorships exist.
Trashing is not democratic, it’s anarchic censorship.......and that’s precisely why editors exist, to counter it.
Thanks for reading
2 Stars
”maybe the ’trash’ button should forward the story to an editor, who decides.”
It’s a good idea.
:)
It’s a good idea.
:)
1 Stars
@ Michael C
Even the editor’s consent to trash the article should be accomapined by proper reasons .What if the dictatorship of crooked minds on Instablogs gets replaced by the dictatorship of editor ? Either limit the intervention of editor or come to frame the panel of reputed and sensible members to decide the fate of controversial article.Then the decision of the panel to trash the article,being accompained by proper reasons,should be put to vote.If the majority comes to ratify the decision of the panel members with proper reason only then the green signal to trash the article be given .
Even the editor’s consent to trash the article should be accomapined by proper reasons .What if the dictatorship of crooked minds on Instablogs gets replaced by the dictatorship of editor ? Either limit the intervention of editor or come to frame the panel of reputed and sensible members to decide the fate of controversial article.Then the decision of the panel to trash the article,being accompained by proper reasons,should be put to vote.If the majority comes to ratify the decision of the panel members with proper reason only then the green signal to trash the article be given .
2 Stars
This word ’trash’ is harsh enough to tell you that your ’thoughts or views’ are deleted.
But I guess, DIGG was clever enough to use ’bury’ instead of ’trashing someone’s opinion’. It is better if someone objects its presence by burying it.
So MANY synonyms to a better effect than to ’trash’, for example: entomb, inhume, etc...
There should be an ultimate delete also, just the rights should be the same voice from the originator of the opinion.
But I guess, DIGG was clever enough to use ’bury’ instead of ’trashing someone’s opinion’. It is better if someone objects its presence by burying it.
So MANY synonyms to a better effect than to ’trash’, for example: entomb, inhume, etc...
There should be an ultimate delete also, just the rights should be the same voice from the originator of the opinion.
2 Stars
@ Arvind
Thank you for your reply. I couldn’t agree more with your concerns concerning the control of what is published and what is not on an internet site. They are legitimate.
But, if I may say so, we do live (or want to, in any case) in a society where free expression is allowed. This means that people also have the right to put up web sites which reflect their general thinking.
Fascists put up their sites. So What? Liberals and socialists too. Jews and muslims as well. THAT’S NORMAL. If you don’t like them, don’t go there!!
What is not normal, on the other hand, is a free-for-all where everyone wants to control the orientation of an internet site.
If someone wants to control what’s put up on a site, GREAT! ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS PUT UP A SITE OF THEIR OWN!! Bandwagon jumpers are everywhere. Not concerned enough to contribute, they behave like spoilt children. They break the toys. Too lazy to do the work, and too bourgois to have real convictions.
LET’S GET REAL HERE!!!!....
Thank you for your reply. I couldn’t agree more with your concerns concerning the control of what is published and what is not on an internet site. They are legitimate.
But, if I may say so, we do live (or want to, in any case) in a society where free expression is allowed. This means that people also have the right to put up web sites which reflect their general thinking.
Fascists put up their sites. So What? Liberals and socialists too. Jews and muslims as well. THAT’S NORMAL. If you don’t like them, don’t go there!!
What is not normal, on the other hand, is a free-for-all where everyone wants to control the orientation of an internet site.
If someone wants to control what’s put up on a site, GREAT! ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS PUT UP A SITE OF THEIR OWN!! Bandwagon jumpers are everywhere. Not concerned enough to contribute, they behave like spoilt children. They break the toys. Too lazy to do the work, and too bourgois to have real convictions.
LET’S GET REAL HERE!!!!....
2 Stars
@ Michael C ,
THE LONG AND SHORT OF TRASHING
I think there are some missing links . I have been on Instablogs for quite a long time now .I have come to realize that there is subtle attempts on the part of some denizens on Istablogs to clip the wings of some writers for the reasons best known to them .Like U.S. they are acting as a watchdog and like U.S. demolishing anyone who is not with them.They have adopted a certain pattern .Plant dubious stories about the person , spread bull-shit lies and if that’s not possible kill the very spirit of the writer via personal attacks enveloped in malicious intent.Instablogs ,of late ,has become idle platform for such distorted , crooked and derailed mindsets.
Cant’ they follow the simple rule that it’s best to ignore the piece if it dosen’t fit within your set of convictions.But that does not happpen. Some people start acting as ”Messiah ” even as they get exposed in an attempt to correct others.They are ready with their dos and don’ts ,fabrications of worse types and twisted logic.It’s not an attempt to silence these wicked people because that’s the very nature of world -to have all type of people . I am merely trying to create room for people who want to say something but are unable to do amid negative currents.
I have come across number of articles on Instablogs discussing size of penis , boobs etc. which for any sensible reader is shocking and appalling and devoid of any clinical purpose .I could have gone in for trash button but I didn’t do . Because it’s quite possible that such article are serving as a life-line for many on Instablogs who either want attention or seek pleausure .So whom am I to deny their quota of pleasure?Though my belief pattern has no place for these articles but this might not be the case with others.For them reading and endorsing such bogus article could be the top priority !!
In my eyes only those articles which are written to destroy the personna of writers , which are written with malicious intent aimed at defaming the writer and articles full of lies ,abuses and distotred facts are fit enough to be trashed but not without proper explanation and strict scrutiny .Let’s not downplay the image of anybody who is trying to resurrect certain values and beliefs with a right mindset. If you can’t digest such articles or for that mattter can’t come to terms with his/her popularity then please get away from his way instead of entering in personal vendetta with set of lies and prejudiced views .It’s my personal request not to turn Instablogs into a medium for settling personal scores . And if you are still intersted in locking bhorns please do it on merit and not via corrupt means .
THE LONG AND SHORT OF TRASHING
I think there are some missing links . I have been on Instablogs for quite a long time now .I have come to realize that there is subtle attempts on the part of some denizens on Istablogs to clip the wings of some writers for the reasons best known to them .Like U.S. they are acting as a watchdog and like U.S. demolishing anyone who is not with them.They have adopted a certain pattern .Plant dubious stories about the person , spread bull-shit lies and if that’s not possible kill the very spirit of the writer via personal attacks enveloped in malicious intent.Instablogs ,of late ,has become idle platform for such distorted , crooked and derailed mindsets.
Cant’ they follow the simple rule that it’s best to ignore the piece if it dosen’t fit within your set of convictions.But that does not happpen. Some people start acting as ”Messiah ” even as they get exposed in an attempt to correct others.They are ready with their dos and don’ts ,fabrications of worse types and twisted logic.It’s not an attempt to silence these wicked people because that’s the very nature of world -to have all type of people . I am merely trying to create room for people who want to say something but are unable to do amid negative currents.
I have come across number of articles on Instablogs discussing size of penis , boobs etc. which for any sensible reader is shocking and appalling and devoid of any clinical purpose .I could have gone in for trash button but I didn’t do . Because it’s quite possible that such article are serving as a life-line for many on Instablogs who either want attention or seek pleausure .So whom am I to deny their quota of pleasure?Though my belief pattern has no place for these articles but this might not be the case with others.For them reading and endorsing such bogus article could be the top priority !!
In my eyes only those articles which are written to destroy the personna of writers , which are written with malicious intent aimed at defaming the writer and articles full of lies ,abuses and distotred facts are fit enough to be trashed but not without proper explanation and strict scrutiny .Let’s not downplay the image of anybody who is trying to resurrect certain values and beliefs with a right mindset. If you can’t digest such articles or for that mattter can’t come to terms with his/her popularity then please get away from his way instead of entering in personal vendetta with set of lies and prejudiced views .It’s my personal request not to turn Instablogs into a medium for settling personal scores . And if you are still intersted in locking bhorns please do it on merit and not via corrupt means .
1 Stars
Now if any of your articles gets trashed please post that here.
Add your Comment
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 



































